0
How did US territory change after the Mexican War ended and how did this change renew the debate over slavery?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
The new territories included California, which extended so far North and South of the Missouri line that both sides claimed it.
A deal had to be put together, and California was admitted to the Union as free soil, in exchange for a couple of new slave-states and a promise to enforce the Fugitive Slave Law more rigorously.
As the Abolitionist lobby was gaining more influence in Congress, this raised the temperature of the debate, especially after the publication of 'Uncle Tom's Cabin' soon afterwards.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What were the central aspects of sectionalism and the slavery debate from the Mexican war to the US Civil War?
The Mexican-War reignited the slavery question, as many of the acquired lands from Mexico became pro-slavery states territories. For example, Texas and New Mexico became pro-slavery while California and Utah didn't. Ultimately, this led to the American Civil War.
The two participants in the great debate over slavery prior to the election of 1858?
Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas were the two participants in the great debate over slavery prior to the election of 1858.
What did the compromise of 1850 propose?
the admission of California as a free state
What events made slavery an issue of public debate?
One reason that slavery became a public debate was Uncle Tom's Cabin, this novel exposed many Northerners to slavery for the first time ever. Also the invention of the cotton gin greatly increased the need for slave labor, so their was a boom in slavery in the South.
What was the site of the last major southern debate over slavery and emancipation?
Virginia Legislature
How did the US territory change after the Mexican-American War ended and how did this change renew the debate over slavery?
What kind of territories to create in the new lands. Should the status be created by Congress or should Popular Soverignty be permitted. How many states should be created and how to draw their borders.
What was the provision that tried to prevent slavery in the Mexican cession?
The Wilmot Proviso, proposed in 1846, aimed to prohibit slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico as a result of the Mexican-American War. Despite never becoming law, it sparked intense debate over the expansion of slavery into newly acquired territories.
How did the wilmot proviso propose to deal with the issue of slavery in the Mexican cession?
The Wilmot Proviso aimed to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. This proposal sparked intense debate over the expansion of slavery into new territories and heightened tensions between the North and the South over the issue of slavery. Although the proviso was never passed into law, it played a significant role in shaping the national debate on slavery and the future expansion of the United States.
What was the purpose of wilt proviso?
The Wilmot Proviso was proposed in 1846 with the goal of prohibiting slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. It was intended to address the growing debate over the extension of slavery into new territories and to prevent its spread.
What did the Wilmer proviso do?
The Wilmot Proviso was a proposal introduced in 1846 that aimed to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. It was not passed by Congress but sparked intense debate between Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery expansion.
What did the debate over slavery in the Mexican cession do?
threatened to split national politics along the North-South lines.
What did the Mexican Cession Bleeding Kansas and John Brown's Raid have in common?
All provoked increased debate over slavery
How did the southern lawmakers feel about slavery in the sectionalist debate of the 1850?
The southern lawmakers felt that slavery was a profitable business and did not want it to end and did not want to lose slave territory.
In the1840's what politicized the debate over slavery in the nation as never before Was it the expansion of slavery into the Mexico territory or The Fugitive Slave Act Uncle Tom's Cabin or John Brown?
Expansion of slavery into acquired territories, such as Texas.
What were the central aspects of sectionalism and the slavery debate from the Mexican war to the US Civil War?
The Mexican-War reignited the slavery question, as many of the acquired lands from Mexico became pro-slavery states territories. For example, Texas and New Mexico became pro-slavery while California and Utah didn't. Ultimately, this led to the American Civil War.
People living in a territory had the right to decide by voting if slavery be allowed?
Popular sovereignty is the principle that residents of a territory have the right to decide whether slavery should be permitted through a direct vote. It was a compromise proposed as part of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 to settle the debate over the extension of slavery into new territories.
Why did popular sovereignty in fact lead to Bleeding Kansas instead of settling the issue of slavery in the Kansas-Nebraska territory?
Popular sovereignty allowed each territory to decide on the issue of slavery through a popular vote. This led to intense and violent conflicts like Bleeding Kansas because pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers flooded the territory to sway the vote in their favor, resulting in armed confrontations and confusion. The inability to peacefully settle the issue in Kansas-Nebraska demonstrated the limitations and flaws of popular sovereignty as a solution to the slavery debate.
