Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThere are certain checks and balances that each branch has over one another, like how the executive branch can veto a bill, but then the legislative branch can override a presidential veto with a 2/3 vote.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agohow could apartheid have been prevented.
they could not enforce laws, could not tax, no executive branch, no court system, and they could not regulate trade.
By appealing to King George III to intervene in their behalf with the Parliament.
They could have prevented WW2 by giving in to the Nazis. -That was not acceptable to the British people.
Having come from a monarchy in England, where all power was controlled by the king and nothing much could be done about it, the Founding Fathers became convinced that it was a bad idea for one branch of government to have all the power. Thus, they designed a system of checks and balances, where each branch served as a check on the power of the other branches, and no one person or branch (not even the president) could do whatever he wished.
CHECKS AND BALANCES PREVENTED ONE GROUP FROM GAINING MORE POWER OVER THE OTHER....
I think it could be............?
With a checks and balances system in place the judicial, executive, and legislative branch of governments are prevented from having too much power. This system provided people with the ability to feel confident that no single branch of government could ignore their voices.
The system of checks and balances within the government keeps one branch from gaining power over another, thus reducing the risk that anyone branch (presidential/ legislative/ judicial) could gain power and create a dictatorship.
The judiciary branch. Although mass media could also be controlled by the legislative or executive branch.
The Legislative Branch for government trials and the Judicial Branch for public trials.
how could apartheid have been prevented.
No, the Roman republic did not have three branches of government. They only had two, hence the motto SPQR---the Senate and the Roman People. The Senate could roughly be defined as the upper branch and the popular assemblies could roughly be defined as the representative branch. The Praetors, who, among other things, corresponded to our judges or judicial branch of government, were a part of the Senatorial branch of government.
You would need to know what each branch could do. Short answer !
A Senator is a member of the Legislative Branch of Government. It is the Legislative Branch which initiates all legislation, so the answere is yes, they could.
why was congress the stongest branch of government in the 1800s
Montesquieu