The citizens in the play are fickle minded that is changing mind and thoughts.
When they are addressed by Brutus they are swayed by his wordings and facts and take the conspirators' side.
But when Antony addressed them they take Caesar 's side.
So it can be said that the Roman mob is fickle minded
Because he knew that the Roman people were fickle-minded and they could be easily moulded. So, he knew how to win the favour of the Romans. Therefore, he pretended to be so humble as to not willing to accept the crown that they may think he was such a kind man. He knew that if he had the support of the people,he could easily become the emperor as mob contributed the major part of Rome.
Julius Caesar did not want to be a "king" in the strict sense of the word. King was a nasty word to the Romans. But Caesar did want all the power, so he was satisfied with the title and powers of a dictator. The reasons for his power-grab were because of his impatience with the slow moving senate, the resistance to some of his reforms and his own ego.
Brutus and Cassius delivered speech to convince the roman mob and give proper reasons for Caesar's death. Then Mark Antony delivered his funeral speech where he succeeded to influence the mindset of the fickle-minded mob in his favour. They began considering Julius Caesar to be the noblest man in Rome. They ran into rage against the conspirators. Brutus and Cassius were driven out of the Gates of Rome and Cinna the poet was killed when the mob punished him for a matching name with Cinna the Conspirator. The armies of 'Brutus and Cassius' and 'Antony and Octabius' geared to fight each other.
JULIUS CAESAR DID MOT BECOME KING OR RULER OF THE ROME BECAUSE HE WAS NOT CONFIDENTLY IN RULLING ROME VERY MUCH.YET HE LOVED ROME VERY MUCH BUT HE DID NOT WANT TO BE SUCCESSOR OF THE PREVIOUS KING. PS.He didn't become Emperor because Emperors were hated and feared at that time.
Benjamin Franklin was VERY open-minded. I mean, if he wasn't very open-minded, how do you think he came up with a firehouse, a library, and other awesome inventions. Seriously, he was TOTALLY open-minded.
i think there's no way to change of being fickle minded, because being a fickle minded is natural..
A fickle minded person are people that often change their mind according to difficulties. it is an unnoticed weakness that many people have.
Cassius has a beef with Julius Caesar, the dictator of Rome, and he is trying to recruit like-minded souls like Brutus and Casca to his cause. The conflict we see in Act 1 is between Cassius and Caesar.
On the basis that fickle means likely to change, esp. due to caprice, irresolution, or instability; casually changeable: fickle weather.,not constant or loyal in affections: a fickle lover THEN a fickle-minded person would probably not be firm, decisive, impressionable, not constant-easily changed.
tanong mo sa buwan
Because he knew that the Roman people were fickle-minded and they could be easily moulded. So, he knew how to win the favour of the Romans. Therefore, he pretended to be so humble as to not willing to accept the crown that they may think he was such a kind man. He knew that if he had the support of the people,he could easily become the emperor as mob contributed the major part of Rome.
It means women who's mind is always changing.. inconsistent thoughts!
A fickle-minded person is someone who is indecisive and changes their opinions or feelings frequently and unpredictably. They may struggle to commit to decisions or stick to their beliefs, often causing frustration or confusion for themselves and others around them.
"Fickle minded" refers to someone who is constantly changing their opinions, decisions, or moods without a clear or consistent pattern. This person may seem indecisive or unreliable due to their tendency to fluctuate quickly in their thoughts or feelings.
The word fickle comes from the Middle English word fikel,meaning 'deceitful, inconstant,' which comes from the Old English word ficol meaning 'deceitful,' which is of Germanic origin.
Noble Romans as Flavius and Cassius feared that if Caesar will come to power, he will assume dictatorial powers and keep all Romans under 'servile fearfulness'. They were well aware of Caesar's nature which was like an 'adder' who was bound to harm people once he came to power. They thought that if Caesar succeeded in getting the crown, he would get the powers to dictate his terms on the general people who were so fickle-minded that they were easily influenced by anyone in power. This would lead to complete downfall of Rome and its people.
Julius Caesar did not want to be a "king" in the strict sense of the word. King was a nasty word to the Romans. But Caesar did want all the power, so he was satisfied with the title and powers of a dictator. The reasons for his power-grab were because of his impatience with the slow moving senate, the resistance to some of his reforms and his own ego.