Revolution always leads to change
Chat with our AI personalities
revolution is not necessary for change bcoz the society by droughts,winds,snow etc.
It changed massively. Especially after the industrial revolution
It is misleading if it carries the implication of a once-for-all change from a "preindustrial" to a "postindustrial" society.
Marx believed that a revolutionary change in a society's economic system would produce a change in society's political systems. Marx's revolution would have been one where the workers of the world (the proletariat) would take the means of production (factories, etc.) away from their owners and controllers (the bourgeoisie. This would be a revolution of one economic class against another. Lenin believed that a revolutionary change in a society's political system was necessary in order to impose a change in the economic system. Lenin's revolution was one where a small group of people (Bolsheviks) seized control of the government (the political entity). The conditions that Marx felt would spark the economic revolution never existed in Russia.
The Industrial revolution, like other evolutions changed things that were in place before the time. This is why it is called a revolution.