Wiki User
∙ 13y agoNo, not in the least. In the Roman Empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoWiki User
∙ 13y agoNo, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
middle ages
It is because they were trying to make a confusion during the war.
In Mexico? The Mexica (commonly misnamed as Aztecs) qualify as such.
Which of the following countries did NOT have a sphere of influence in China in the 19th century
Rome's population was over 1,000,000 (1 million) in the height of it's power and prosperity.
No.
Kuwait dinar 3.51247 USD 0.284700
Ashurbanipal was the Assyrian king during the height of the Assyrian Empire.
To compare the original height of a ball to its rebound height, you can measure the height the ball was dropped from and then measure the height it rebounds to after bouncing. The rebound height will likely be lower than the original height due to energy loss during the bounce. By comparing the two heights, you can calculate the percentage of energy lost during the rebound.
According to various tabloids, her height is: 5' 8".
According to various tabloids, her height is: 5' 8".
Collectively they are called a continuos variable
No Your sperm production or your masturbation has nothing to do with your height.
the height of the tides rises up
Christianity was the major religion that was born during a time when the Roman Empire was near its height.
Christianity was the major religion that was born during a time when the Roman Empire was near its height.
No. In principal the compression on the leg joints will "slightly" decrease your height. However this will be compensated during the night, when you will actually gain height.