No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
they ate nasty food
Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.
Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.
The rich Romans did. The poor Romans who could not afford to throw parties ate their food from a sitting position.
Since whatever the poor used must have been something that could not endure staying the same shape for years and years to come. And because when whoever took over the Romans they kept the good stuff ( Rich romans houses and mansions...) and destroyed the things they didn't need ( poor people things) Addition Look for books by Mary Beard on the excavations at Pompeii. For example the contents of the sewers can be examined to find what the rich and poor ate. She says the poor were surprisingly well fed.
Rich Romans lived in amazing houses poor Romans didn't. Rich Romans ate delectable food poor Romans didn't rich Romans had money poor ones didn't rich ones didn't work poor ones did but there is a difference between poor Romans and slaves were people who were very poor and were owned. and if you want to learn the difference between slaves and rich people or poor people and slaves i recommend going on to wikipedia it is a very advanced website that has about 20 A4 pages about every single precise subject.
The poor Romans sometimes ate roasted pig, chicken or cows as their meat.
Poor Romans tended to eat cereal grains (such as porridge and bread) at all meals.
Many Romans lived in fancy housing and had luxurious furniture while the poor had insulars[bad houses]. The rich Romans had awsome food and liked to show off.
rich Romans lived in big houses or beautiful palaces
rich Romans lived in big houses or beautiful palaces
they lived in old apartments
they ate nasty food
The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".
Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.
their own languageCatholicismsockshealth programs for the poor
They have citizenship, which places them in a privileged relationship with non-citizens.