answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did the poor Romans have butter?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What did poor Romans eat?

they ate nasty food


What was one food that the Romans never ate?

Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.


Did the poor Romans have education?

Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.


Did the Romans eat food at parties lying down?

The rich Romans did. The poor Romans who could not afford to throw parties ate their food from a sitting position.


Why do you have less evidence about the poor Romans than the rich Romans?

Since whatever the poor used must have been something that could not endure staying the same shape for years and years to come. And because when whoever took over the Romans they kept the good stuff ( Rich romans houses and mansions...) and destroyed the things they didn't need ( poor people things) Addition Look for books by Mary Beard on the excavations at Pompeii. For example the contents of the sewers can be examined to find what the rich and poor ate. She says the poor were surprisingly well fed.

Related questions

How were the lives of rich and poor Romans different?

Rich Romans lived in amazing houses poor Romans didn't. Rich Romans ate delectable food poor Romans didn't rich Romans had money poor ones didn't rich ones didn't work poor ones did but there is a difference between poor Romans and slaves were people who were very poor and were owned. and if you want to learn the difference between slaves and rich people or poor people and slaves i recommend going on to wikipedia it is a very advanced website that has about 20 A4 pages about every single precise subject.


What did the poor Romans eat as meat?

The poor Romans sometimes ate roasted pig, chicken or cows as their meat.


What foods did the poor Romans eat?

Poor Romans tended to eat cereal grains (such as porridge and bread) at all meals.


Difference between rich and poor Romans?

Many Romans lived in fancy housing and had luxurious furniture while the poor had insulars[bad houses]. The rich Romans had awsome food and liked to show off.


How rich and poor Romans lived.?

rich Romans lived in big houses or beautiful palaces


How did rich and poor Romans lived?

rich Romans lived in big houses or beautiful palaces


What kind of houses did wealthy Romans live in?

The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".


Were did the poor Romans live?

they lived in old apartments


What did poor Romans eat?

they ate nasty food


What was one food that the Romans never ate?

Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.


What did the Romans develop on their own.?

their own languageCatholicismsockshealth programs for the poor


What do poor Romans and rich Romans have in common?

They have citizenship, which places them in a privileged relationship with non-citizens.