First of all understand that there was no concept of "university" in the ancient Roman world. Their education system was very different from ours. While the primary education was given at home and then in schools, the higher education was always given by tutors who specialized in certain subjects. For example, many young Roman men were sent to Greece to learn rhetoric from one of the masters who had a school there. (rhetoric was very important in politics and public life) Politics would not be taught. A Roman such as Caesar, would absorb the ins and outs of the political system from family and social connections. He would get noticed by either prosecuting or defending in the senate.
First of all understand that there was no concept of "university" in the ancient Roman world. Their education system was very different from ours. While the primary education was given at home and then in schools, the higher education was always given by tutors who specialized in certain subjects. For example, many young Roman men were sent to Greece to learn rhetoric from one of the masters who had a school there. (rhetoric was very important in politics and public life) Politics would not be taught. A Roman such as Caesar, would absorb the ins and outs of the political system from family and social connections. He would get noticed by either prosecuting or defending in the senate.
First of all understand that there was no concept of "university" in the ancient Roman world. Their education system was very different from ours. While the primary education was given at home and then in schools, the higher education was always given by tutors who specialized in certain subjects. For example, many young Roman men were sent to Greece to learn rhetoric from one of the masters who had a school there. (rhetoric was very important in politics and public life) Politics would not be taught. A Roman such as Caesar, would absorb the ins and outs of the political system from family and social connections. He would get noticed by either prosecuting or defending in the senate.
First of all understand that there was no concept of "university" in the ancient Roman world. Their education system was very different from ours. While the primary education was given at home and then in schools, the higher education was always given by tutors who specialized in certain subjects. For example, many young Roman men were sent to Greece to learn rhetoric from one of the masters who had a school there. (rhetoric was very important in politics and public life) Politics would not be taught. A Roman such as Caesar, would absorb the ins and outs of the political system from family and social connections. He would get noticed by either prosecuting or defending in the senate.
First of all understand that there was no concept of "university" in the ancient Roman world. Their education system was very different from ours. While the primary education was given at home and then in schools, the higher education was always given by tutors who specialized in certain subjects. For example, many young Roman men were sent to Greece to learn rhetoric from one of the masters who had a school there. (rhetoric was very important in politics and public life) Politics would not be taught. A Roman such as Caesar, would absorb the ins and outs of the political system from family and social connections. He would get noticed by either prosecuting or defending in the senate.
First of all understand that there was no concept of "university" in the ancient Roman world. Their education system was very different from ours. While the primary education was given at home and then in schools, the higher education was always given by tutors who specialized in certain subjects. For example, many young Roman men were sent to Greece to learn rhetoric from one of the masters who had a school there. (rhetoric was very important in politics and public life) Politics would not be taught. A Roman such as Caesar, would absorb the ins and outs of the political system from family and social connections. He would get noticed by either prosecuting or defending in the senate.
First of all understand that there was no concept of "university" in the ancient Roman world. Their education system was very different from ours. While the primary education was given at home and then in schools, the higher education was always given by tutors who specialized in certain subjects. For example, many young Roman men were sent to Greece to learn rhetoric from one of the masters who had a school there. (rhetoric was very important in politics and public life) Politics would not be taught. A Roman such as Caesar, would absorb the ins and outs of the political system from family and social connections. He would get noticed by either prosecuting or defending in the senate.
First of all understand that there was no concept of "university" in the ancient Roman world. Their education system was very different from ours. While the primary education was given at home and then in schools, the higher education was always given by tutors who specialized in certain subjects. For example, many young Roman men were sent to Greece to learn rhetoric from one of the masters who had a school there. (rhetoric was very important in politics and public life) Politics would not be taught. A Roman such as Caesar, would absorb the ins and outs of the political system from family and social connections. He would get noticed by either prosecuting or defending in the senate.
First of all understand that there was no concept of "university" in the ancient Roman world. Their education system was very different from ours. While the primary education was given at home and then in schools, the higher education was always given by tutors who specialized in certain subjects. For example, many young Roman men were sent to Greece to learn rhetoric from one of the masters who had a school there. (rhetoric was very important in politics and public life) Politics would not be taught. A Roman such as Caesar, would absorb the ins and outs of the political system from family and social connections. He would get noticed by either prosecuting or defending in the senate.
First of all understand that there was no concept of "university" in the ancient Roman world. Their education system was very different from ours. While the primary education was given at home and then in schools, the higher education was always given by tutors who specialized in certain subjects. For example, many young Roman men were sent to Greece to learn rhetoric from one of the masters who had a school there. (rhetoric was very important in politics and public life) Politics would not be taught. A Roman such as Caesar, would absorb the ins and outs of the political system from family and social connections. He would get noticed by either prosecuting or defending in the senate.
Julius Caesar was captured by pirates while he was in Greece to study philosophy.
History is the study of the past in search to find the truth. Some people wish to find the truth about Julius Caesar, while others are curious about the life of one of Rome's greatest emperors.
Julius Caesar was killed because he was a threat to the republic, or what was left of the republic. There is no historical evidence that he was going to disband the senate. It was just another rumor surrounding the final days of Caesar. If you study the character of Julius Caesar, you will find that although he was impatient and wanted things done quickly and his way, he was also a traditionalist in his political life.
well ya no get the teachers addition from skynerd johnson or aka lane johnson
No this is a secondary source. A primary sourced is something written in documents or by authors of the time of the subject of the study.
Julius Caesar was captured by pirates while he was in Greece to study philosophy.
History is the study of the past in search to find the truth. Some people wish to find the truth about Julius Caesar, while others are curious about the life of one of Rome's greatest emperors.
Anne Fine studied Politics at Warwick University.
Emery- Studying Politics
Julius Caesar was killed because he was a threat to the republic, or what was left of the republic. There is no historical evidence that he was going to disband the senate. It was just another rumor surrounding the final days of Caesar. If you study the character of Julius Caesar, you will find that although he was impatient and wanted things done quickly and his way, he was also a traditionalist in his political life.
well ya no get the teachers addition from skynerd johnson or aka lane johnson
Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is considered one of his greatest works.It rather accurately depicts the contemporary Elizabethan anxiety over succession. As civil war erupted when Julius Caesar was murdered, the English were worried that the death of Queen Elizabeth - who was quite old and frail at the time, with no successors - would lead to civil war in England.It is also famous for misrepresenting historical facts. Plutarch, a Roman historian, is a widely trusted source for Julius Caesar's death: but Shakespeare fudged the classic Et tu, Brute? and other details.Also, Julius Caesar remains a Shakespearean work at heart, with clever use of language and rhetoric that you should become familiar with if you intend to study Shakespeare, or even English in general.
No this is a secondary source. A primary sourced is something written in documents or by authors of the time of the subject of the study.
Facts about Julius Caesar include that he:was named after his father.conquered Gaul ( France).joined the army outside of Rome and didn't come back for nine years.was a Dictatorwas a successful politicianwas a seducer of women.became a key historical figure who is still important enough to study in school.
latin culture study? cannot find anything for that question anywhereee
Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.Gaul is related to Julius Caesar because Caesar initiated military action in Gaul, conquered it and made it part of the Roman empire. It brought him fame, extreme wealth and jealousy. He wrote his commentaries on the war in Gaul describing his actions and both history and military students study them today. Because he wrote in clear, rather simple Latin (so the masses back home in Rome could read them) second year Latin students still have to struggle through the translations and some of them fervently with that Julius Caesar had never had any relationship with Gaul.