answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No, she did not. Tsar Alexander II did in 1861.

**expanded**

Alexander II 1819-1882 known as 'Tsar Liberator" for his emancipation of Russia's serf (indentured servants) population in 1861, eighteen months before President Abraham Lincoln made his famous "emancipation proclamation" in the United States. Alexander II's reign was characterized by his egalitarian ideals and many of his reforms literally brought Russia into the industrialized Nineteenth Century and on par with Western Europe both culturally and economically.

Russia alternately thrived and chafed under Alexanders reforms. In true Brother's Grimm fashion these great socio-political reforms became weapons of regicide. Russia in the mid nineteenth century is said to have undergone a "second renaissance" of her own through the artistic and social climate of the age. Some of histories greatest works of literature such as the novels of Tolstoy; War and Peace, Anna Karenina, or the symphonies of Peter Tchaikovsky; Swan Lake. Playwright Anton Chekov, with his emphasis on his characters emotional complexity radically altering the stage forever. Serov known not only for his work as a portraitist but his impressionistic pieces as well, all came from Russia during the mid to early-late 1800's. Enlightened thought and theory along with a "less censorious" press flourished in Moscow and even Kiev, it was in Peter the Great's artificial capital of St. Petersburg where they came to life both magnificently and scurrilously.

Flourishing concurrently yet discreetly beneath the majority of enlightened society resided the Revolutionary. Not to be confused with those of the American or French revolutionaries of the eighteenth century, these for the most part were semi-educated, disenfranchised, children and grandchildren of the previously enslaved "serfs". Stuck somewhere between the aristocratic establishment and the impoverished and illiterate "serfdom class" that flooded the larger cities in the empire upon being freed much like the American south during the years of reconstruction which followed the American civil war. Author; Edvard Radzinsky, in his book, The Last Tsar compares the age to the last days of the fabled Atlantis in which the greatest achievements of a civilization turn upon herself while her inhabitants cast a blind eye and "danced upon the precipice." The gruesome beauty of a Russian Fairy Tale.

By the 1870's society had become mainly complacent and in the more radical salons of Petersburg: indolent and mean. Tsar Alexander II's reign was in its third decade while Alexander found himself at the nucleus of not his empire but as husband and father to a second "imperial family". Romanov Tsars and Tsaritsa' for that matter were well known for their public philandering but in the case of Alexander Nicholaievich Romanov, guided by idealism and sentiment throughout his life: had fallen deeply in love with one mistress in particular: a young, orphaned aristocrat called Catherine Dolgorukaya. The Tsar fathered three children with Dolgorukaya and moved his illegitimate family into the Winter Palace right alongside the Empress and the Imperial nursery. To the delight of scandalized society who watched in an unprecedented de-mystification of the Imperial family much like characters in a Chekov one act. The Tsar, by all accounts a more than effective governor had become complacent alongside his subjects and simply wanted to live happily with his new wife and family, of whom he made no secret, was the obvious target for radical revolutionaries who failed or rather because of their class, lacked the education to discern the ambiguities that exist within any cause.

Alexander the II the Tsar Liberator who much like his ancestor Peter the Great forced Russia onto the Western European diplomatic and cultural stage with his great intellect and high ideals was blown to bits by an assassin's makeshift bomb hurled at his carriage as he drove along the Nevsky Prospect on a brilliant, winter morning the first of March 1881. Unhurt by a first assassin's bomb which splintered his carriage and dismembered one of his Cossacks and his mount riding alongside; Alexander ministering to the wounded and dying when another revolutionary hurtled himself and the bomb he was armed with pell mell at the Tsar screaming "It is the will of God". This time after seven failed assassination attempts the Bolshevik revolutionaries struck an ugly yet monumental victory in favor of their cause. Meanwhile, the Tsar mangled from any recognition, unmercifully alive managed to make the sign of the cross as he whispered to his coachman: "to the palace to die." Summoning Herculean strength to be driven a half mile to the Winter Palace, carelessly drug across the Olympian forecourt to his private apartments, un-dressed and dressed again in the Uniform of an Imperial General, medals and honors in place, clung to life still longer as he waited for all members of both Imperial families to assemble blessing his children and calling for his beloved "Katya" known now as Princess Sergievskaya the Tsar's last imperial decree just weeks prior was to legitimatize his mistress in what surely must have been a moment of foreboding much like a darkly, idealistic page torn from the Brothers Grimm.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did Catherine the Great free the Russian serfs?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

How and why might the surf become free?

If you are refering to Russian serfdom. Russian serfs were free in the emacipation reform of 1861. Over 20 million serfs were given their freedom. They were also granted the right to get married with out haveing to seek consent.


Were the serfs forced to fight in the army after the emancipation in Russia?

In theory, serfs were supposed to be protected by their lords. This might have meant that in theory, the serfs should not have got involved in wars. Another way of interpreting this theory was that the serfs were to be protected by organizing them for defense. But one way or the other, the serfs got involved in the wars, either as participants or as victims. There is a link below to the section on serfs' duties in an article on serfdom. According to it, there is some debate on whether serfs could be legally required to fight in combat. My bet is that the laws varied depending on time and place, and that any rule protecting the serfs was bound to be broken as required by the lord.


Russian czar who freed the serfs?

Tsar Alexander II "freed" the serfs in 1861, but the serfs were still bound to the land for another 49 years. The Russian government took land from the landowners and paid them for it. This land was put into collectives and each serf had to make enough money over the next 49 years to repay the government the money it had given to the landowners. Once the debt was paid off the serf was free to leave if he wanted. Alexander II was assassinated in 1881.


Who was the czar who freed the serfs?

Tsar Alexander II "freed" the serfs. He didn't free them entirely though. Serfs were bound to the land they worked on rather to the owners of the land. Alexander II had the Russian government buy some land from the owners and gave the land to the "freed" serfs in collective in each village. The serf remained bond to the land until he repaid the government the money it had paid to the owners over a 49 year period of time. A serf could leave the land but would have no land to work.


Did Tsar Alexander II of Russia free the serfs?

Yes, he did, although the serfs weren't happy with the "freedom" they got and the landowners weren't happy with how they got it. Alexander II was assassinated, but it wasn't necessarily because of freeing the serfs.

Related questions

How and why might the surf become free?

If you are refering to Russian serfdom. Russian serfs were free in the emacipation reform of 1861. Over 20 million serfs were given their freedom. They were also granted the right to get married with out haveing to seek consent.


To what extent did enlightened rulers like Catherine ii of Russia or Joseph ii of austria truly seek to implement elements of the enlightenment?

The enlightened rulers tried to seek to implement the elements to the extent that they did not have to get rid of themselves and give the power to the people because if they did this then a revolution would occur like the french revolution and later on the Russian revolution. Catherine the great herself had somewhat predicted the Russian revolution in 1917 and that is why she did not free her serfs because if she did then they would probably rise against her and she would lose her job as empress of Russia


Which emperor decided to free the serfs?

Tsar Alexander II "freed" the serfs in 1861, which sounded well and good but they weren't truly freed. In order to provide the "freed" serfs with land to work and live on, the Russian government took land from the owners, paid them for it then turned it over to village collectives called mirs. The serfs were part of the mir and were required to repay the Russian government over a 49 year period. The "free" serfs could not leave the land until the government was fully paid. Neither the landowners nor the serfs were happy with the situation. Alexander II was later assassinated in 1881.


Why did serfdom survive in Russia long after it had died out in western Europe?

The Russian nobility weren’t willing to free the people who were in serfdom. Catherine the Great presented the idea to her court and was turned down.


Were the serfs forced to fight in the army after the emancipation in Russia?

In theory, serfs were supposed to be protected by their lords. This might have meant that in theory, the serfs should not have got involved in wars. Another way of interpreting this theory was that the serfs were to be protected by organizing them for defense. But one way or the other, the serfs got involved in the wars, either as participants or as victims. There is a link below to the section on serfs' duties in an article on serfdom. According to it, there is some debate on whether serfs could be legally required to fight in combat. My bet is that the laws varied depending on time and place, and that any rule protecting the serfs was bound to be broken as required by the lord.


Russian czar who freed the serfs?

Tsar Alexander II "freed" the serfs in 1861, but the serfs were still bound to the land for another 49 years. The Russian government took land from the landowners and paid them for it. This land was put into collectives and each serf had to make enough money over the next 49 years to repay the government the money it had given to the landowners. Once the debt was paid off the serf was free to leave if he wanted. Alexander II was assassinated in 1881.


What country was the last to free the serfs?

The last countries to free serfs (as opposed to slaves) were Tibet and Bhutan, in 1959. The last serfs freed in Europe were in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in 1918. Please see the link below.


Freeing the serfs did what for the Russians?

In practical effects, it did nothing. Serfs were bound to the land that they worked. When Tsar Alexander II issued the Emancipation Manifesto it freed the serfs but created economic conditions that made it impractical to leave. The Russian government took land from the owners but paid them for it. Then the serfs were required to repay the government with what were called "redemption payments." Typically, redemption took about 49 years. Serfs were free to leave but if they did leave they had no land to work. Many left for the cities to work in factories instead. If former serfs wanted to own their own farms, they had to pay the redemption payments first.


How were serfs different from freemen?

Serfs were slaves tied to the land and lord and nothing would free them. Freemen were peasants who had bought their freedom.


Who was the czar who freed the serfs?

Tsar Alexander II "freed" the serfs. He didn't free them entirely though. Serfs were bound to the land they worked on rather to the owners of the land. Alexander II had the Russian government buy some land from the owners and gave the land to the "freed" serfs in collective in each village. The serf remained bond to the land until he repaid the government the money it had paid to the owners over a 49 year period of time. A serf could leave the land but would have no land to work.


Did Tsar Alexander II of Russia free the serfs?

Yes, he did, although the serfs weren't happy with the "freedom" they got and the landowners weren't happy with how they got it. Alexander II was assassinated, but it wasn't necessarily because of freeing the serfs.


Why did lords free their serfs?

The relationship between lords and serfs was not the same as the relationship between owners and slaves. The lords and the serfs had duties and obligations to each other. That being the case, there were times, such as when there were too many serfs for the lands the manor had, when it was in a lord's economic best interest to free serfs who wanted to be freed. Some of the serfs would be likely to want to leave and others want to stay and not have to deal with the insecurity of not having a place to live. At other times, such as after the Black Death, lords who did not have enough serfs would try to entice those of other lords away from them. In such a case they offered a better deal, which might have included their not being serfs any more. Serfs who wanted to could sometimes make themselves free by leaving the manor and staying away for over a year. Strangely enough this was the law in some places.