He went on 2 voyages but it's unknown if he went on a third. And for all you people who are doing a project on him (like me) just say he went on two cause the third one was actually not a voyage it was a trip to visit a place that he passed but wanted to go back to on his first voyage.
John Cabot * John Cabot was an Italian-born explorer who, in attempting to find a direct route to Asia, became the first early modern European to discover North America. Cabot was most likely born in Genoa but might of have been from a Venetian family. In 1490, he moved to England, settling in Bristol. In May 1497, with the support of the English king Henry the seventh, Cabot sailed west from Bristol on the Matthew in the hope of finding a route to Asia. On the 24th of June he sighted land and called it New-found-land. He believed it was Asia and claimed it for England. But it was what is know called Canada. He returned to England and began to plan a second voyage. In May 1498, he set out on a further voyage with a fleet of four or five ships, aiming to discover Japan. The fate of the expedition is unknown; it is thought that Cabot eventually reached North America but never managed to return across the Atlantic ocean. Full Name: Giovanni Caboto Countries: Italy, England Date of Birth: 1450, Italy (exact date unknown) Date of Death: There is no accurate record of the date or reason for the death of John Cabot. Where he was born, lived, and died: He was born in Genoa Italy, and moved to England. It is unknown to where he died. Famous for: Naming Newfoundland and partly discovering it (vikings came earlier). Purpose of voyage: To find a new route to Asia
Bob the builder
I have looked all over the web for this question! I have come to the conclusion that his cargo was unknown!
He knows he will miss things that an only be found on land, and that the voyage might be dangerous, but he loves the sea and is willing to sacrifice and take chances to do what he loves.
He went on 2 voyages but it's unknown if he went on a third. And for all you people who are doing a project on him (like me) just say he went on two cause the third one was actually not a voyage it was a trip to visit a place that he passed but wanted to go back to on his first voyage.
It might have been Bjarni Herjólfsson.Please see the link.
John Cabot * John Cabot was an Italian-born explorer who, in attempting to find a direct route to Asia, became the first early modern European to discover North America. Cabot was most likely born in Genoa but might of have been from a Venetian family. In 1490, he moved to England, settling in Bristol. In May 1497, with the support of the English king Henry the seventh, Cabot sailed west from Bristol on the Matthew in the hope of finding a route to Asia. On the 24th of June he sighted land and called it New-found-land. He believed it was Asia and claimed it for England. But it was what is know called Canada. He returned to England and began to plan a second voyage. In May 1498, he set out on a further voyage with a fleet of four or five ships, aiming to discover Japan. The fate of the expedition is unknown; it is thought that Cabot eventually reached North America but never managed to return across the Atlantic ocean. Full Name: Giovanni Caboto Countries: Italy, England Date of Birth: 1450, Italy (exact date unknown) Date of Death: There is no accurate record of the date or reason for the death of John Cabot. Where he was born, lived, and died: He was born in Genoa Italy, and moved to England. It is unknown to where he died. Famous for: Naming Newfoundland and partly discovering it (vikings came earlier). Purpose of voyage: To find a new route to Asia
It's John Cabot, and he was looking for gold and the North West Passage. He might have also been exploring.
You might actually be referring to the Surveyor which landed on June 2nd 1966.
There is not a problem with saying 'in to the sea', 'sea' being a noun, but saying 'in to the voyage', even though 'voyage' is also a noun, does not make sense. The reason for this is that the sea is something of substance, into which we can go, whilst a voyage, being temporal, is not, and so we can't, in that sense, go in to it, You could, of course, make a case for a metaphysical 'Into The Voyage'. 'On With The Voyage' or 'The Voyage Begins' might be better.
Possibly Leif Ericsson
Yes!! The Voyage of the Dawn Treader is so good! PS if you have glasses, the 3D ones might be hard to slip on
They are symbols of the dangers of the sea, that a ship or sailor might not return from a voyage.
Bob the builder
I have looked all over the web for this question! I have come to the conclusion that his cargo was unknown!
He didnt know if he wanted his army to go into it because they might get smaller.