0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is the affirmative action policy morally defensible Explain?
The affirmative action policy is also known as positive discrimination and dictates that a certain number of jobs, school vacancies, etc. must be filled by people of a certain criteria, such as the aged, poor, women, minorities, etc. This policy is not morally justifiable, because by holding organizations to those quotas, they could be favoring unqualified individuals over people who actually deserve the openings.
Why should affirmative action be used?
Affirmative Action is the act of setting aside spots for minorities, or women to give the disadvantaged equal opportunities. One well known affirmative action case was Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). It is a serious federal offense for any employer subject to EEO law to "set aside" jobs based on race. Congress prohibited that in the 1964 Civil Rights Act and Congress never enacted an Affirmative Action statute. AA is part of contracting regulations, and can NEVER trump or violate a statute. AA - if an employer volunteers to participate - requires three things: a written pledge not to violate the sex-blind, color blind EEO laws during the contract, an analysis of whether each of the employer's job families are significantly different in race or sex stats from the general workforce in which that employer recruits for that job family IF any job family is significantly different from what would be expected from race-blind, sex-blind recruiting, the employer proposes a plan for reducing the disparity without violating Title VII.
What are some typical wordings in a CGL policy?
Relating to what part of the policy?
What was not part of national policy of isolationism during the 1920s and early 1930s?
Type your answer here...Which of the following was not part of national policy of isolationism during the 1920s and early 1930s?
How is the Berlin Wall part of the US policy of containment?
it's not
Is the affirmative action policy morally defensible Explain?
The affirmative action policy is also known as positive discrimination and dictates that a certain number of jobs, school vacancies, etc. must be filled by people of a certain criteria, such as the aged, poor, women, minorities, etc. This policy is not morally justifiable, because by holding organizations to those quotas, they could be favoring unqualified individuals over people who actually deserve the openings.
Is the affirmative action morally defensible explain?
Yes the affirmative action is morally defensive because it gives the minority and disadvantaged people in a given society to take part in nation building.
What is AA candidate?
AA candidate typically refers to an Affirmative Action candidate. Affirmative Action programs are designed to increase representation of minority groups in education and employment. So, an AA candidate would be someone who is considered as part of such initiatives to promote diversity and equal opportunities.
Which action is a part of the secretary of defense role in foreign policy?
Managing national security
Which is not part of the Bush doctrine of foreign policy?
Diplomacy at all costs is not part of the Bush doctrine of foreign policy.
Which action is a part of the president's role in foreign policy?
Answer this question… Making final decisions
What action is a part of the secretary of state's role in foreign policy?
Managing national security
What are quotas?
Quotas are:A proportional part or share; the share or proportion assigned to each in a division.A prescribed number or percentage that may serve as, for example, a maximum, a minimum, or a goal.A restriction on the import of something to a specific quantity.
Was Barack Obama accepted at Columbia University as part of an affirmative action program?
This is a claim that is very commonly found on conservative websites, but there is no evidence to support it. There is also no evidence that he received any special treatment to help him get into Harvard Law School.
Affirmative action draws people to work they never considered before What does it mean?
This is a subjective answer, so this is my opinion. I think you will agree too though. An affirmative action is any action that you agree with or see good cause in. So the phrase "Affirmative action draws people to work they never considered before" means that if someone sees something being done that they agree or side with, they will become a part of it. I.E. If a commercial fisherman learns how the fish he catches are slaughtered and processed and finds a group of people who fight for humanely slaughtered animals, then he may quit his job and fight for what he thinks is right. The above example is extreme. Though the phrase says work, it won't always mean an occupation. In its simplest form, this means supporting a group of activists that fight for something you believe is right.
How does US action in cuba demonstrate the policy of containment?
When Russia placed the missiles on Cuba it was warned that they needed to be removed and when they weren't action was taken by enacting a blockade of the island. This was part of the policy of containment by the United States not to allow Russia to influence the development of a communist country within the sphere of influence of the US.
Why should affirmative action be used?
Affirmative Action is the act of setting aside spots for minorities, or women to give the disadvantaged equal opportunities. One well known affirmative action case was Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). It is a serious federal offense for any employer subject to EEO law to "set aside" jobs based on race. Congress prohibited that in the 1964 Civil Rights Act and Congress never enacted an Affirmative Action statute. AA is part of contracting regulations, and can NEVER trump or violate a statute. AA - if an employer volunteers to participate - requires three things: a written pledge not to violate the sex-blind, color blind EEO laws during the contract, an analysis of whether each of the employer's job families are significantly different in race or sex stats from the general workforce in which that employer recruits for that job family IF any job family is significantly different from what would be expected from race-blind, sex-blind recruiting, the employer proposes a plan for reducing the disparity without violating Title VII.
