Some people did dig their own graves, and did get shot and buried in those graves.
the premise that you are working from is false, therefore cannot be answered because there were not people in that group. They were killed because the Nazis believed that they might have beliefs, people who did not have the belief were killed alongside those who did not, because of how the Nazis classified them not how they classified themselves.
Undoubtedly Adolf Hitler was his own vision behind his mission. With limited military resources one cant get victory over counterparts. In that process he was very cleverly Involve his people along with his forces. Normally peace loving people does not join in war field. To unite them on a common cause he wants to focus on Aryan identity. Thus Nazis efforts was partially good results according to their vision. LS Bhaaji
Guilt is determined in a court of law. Some people had the choice of serving in the German Army or being killed. Others took the law into their own hands and killed people on their own. The Nuremberg trials determined the last group guilty of "Crimes Against Humanity." Whether or not the people who helped the Nazis were guilty would depend on their type of involvement. The Nazi regime itself was both evil and guilty.___The word guilt is also widely used in a moral sense as well as a legal sense.
The term "gypsies" refers to the Roma people, who were a targeted group during the Holocaust. They were subject to persecution, forced labor, and mass killings by the Nazis and their collaborators. It is estimated that hundreds of thousands of Roma people were killed during this time.
yes because i have been there to see with my very own eyes
Some people did dig their own graves, and did get shot and buried in those graves.
he just didnth like Jewish people
Like any group of people engaging in genocide, the Nazis did not consider the Holocaust victims to be "their own people". In order to engage in this type of killing of a group of people, it is necessary to cast them as different, and indeed, less than human. This can be seen in the extermination of native populations in America, recent mass murders in Rwanda and Darfur, the killings of Kurds in Iraq in the 1980s, etc. So when President George Bush was making the argument that Saddam Hussein "gassed his own people" (referring to the Kurds), it's worth noting that while that was technically accurate, Hussein did not consider the Kurds to be "his own people". In the same way, Nazis did not consider the victims of their own mass murders to be "their own people".
lady brown eyes? hey, there ya go - Brownie, Browny,Brown, ladyeyesis, personally i think Lady Brown Eyes is good on its own.
"Its for your own good" is an expression used by someone (who usually loves you) when they have to make a choice on your behalf (that in their eyes is in your long term interest) but that you may not like.
because it dosent please the lord
The inigma decoder
yes ghosts come in people because i saw with my own eyes
It wasn't necessarily justified in everybody's eyes. But in his own eyes, and obviously the eyes of congress, he justified it as saying that he was not holding people hostage, he was holding them to see if they were or were not communists.
Nazis took away the Jew's right to own property.
the premise that you are working from is false, therefore cannot be answered because there were not people in that group. They were killed because the Nazis believed that they might have beliefs, people who did not have the belief were killed alongside those who did not, because of how the Nazis classified them not how they classified themselves.