Well, it's better than 58% lung capacity.
Athletic students have better lung capacity because they working out all the parts in there body. And there lungs are better than students who are not atheltic . Athletic students have better lung capacity because they working out all the parts in there body. And there lungs are better than students who are not atheltic .
True
They might be turning to lung cancer by then... better have a check up with a doctor. http://www.about-lung-cancer.com.
One is not "better" than the other - they will both perform exactly the same as a non transplanted heart or lungs. Neither will make the patient bionic or superhuman. A patient with heart failure would rather have a heart transplant than a lung transplant, and vice versa. It's whatever it "better" (more useful) for the patient, but neither hearts or lung transplants are "better" overall.
the advantages of cloning are that if you have something wrong with you e.g a lung of yours fails to work than you can take the lung out of the clone to make yourself better.
Higher. This means your lungs can hold more air.
Go on the internet to find out more. It's the breathing system, you can still live with just one lung but much better if you have both your lungs healthy and in tact.
cuz u suc
Consisting of thousands of tiny air sacs increases the surface area inside of the lung which allows for better gas exchange. If the lung was made of one larger air sac, you would not be able to exchange as many gases (oxygen/CO2) with each breath.
Kidney is in the front lung is behind it. Also your gallbladder and a couple of other are there.... A better description of the place would help. Like in the rib cage or under in?
Lung compliance = Lung expandability