The answer to this question varies by circumstance and location.
In the United States, the states make the specific laws that deal with HIV transmission. Some states have legislation in place while others have yet to address the topic. In states where HIV transmission is legislatively regulated, like Indiana, these laws are often called "Duty to Warn" laws. In short, the laws usually require that, when a person is aware they are HIV positive, they are required to warn any furture partners before engaging in at-risk behaviors with them. However, if a person is unaware of their HIV status, they would not be liable for transmitting infection.
These laws vary by state. Some states, like Kentucky, do not have regulations in place at this time.
pkkvgkb
Aids is affecting our world by spreading it knowing you have it and not doing anything about it.
(in the US) There is no nationwide law governing this, it is left to the individual states to legislate on the act. Since AIDS is considered a deadly disease, most (all?) states treat it as an offense - a dangerous assault - and charge the person with the infection as an assaulter.
I would hope we all are against the virus, not the person. I certainly am not against someone because they have AIDS or HIV.
Aids Logo stands for people standing together to try and get the message out to be safe when you have relations with someone. And let's try to stop the spreading of aids.
No. Discriminating someone because they wear glasses, hearing aids and so on is against the law.
in order to stop it from spreading and teach other people about it.
Holocaust 2.0 The fight against AIDS
Oral contraceptives do not protect against AIDS
The disease AIDS is currently considered a pandemic. It classifies as this due to it being a problem in a large area of the world and it's constant spreading.
No,Charles Barkley Doesn´t Have AIDS,He Is Just Friends With Magic Johnson Who have Aids,But He Donnates Money For Charities Against AIDS
The word 'illegal' means 'against the law', so if any actions designed to spread religion in schools are against the law, then they are both illegal and unethical. No religion that respects the law or seeks to uphold high ethical standards would allow such a law to be broken, even if it disagrees with that law. In the United States the Constitution has been held to limit spreading of religion in public schools.