The performance results would decline, but the selection process would remain the same
A decimal benchmark example would be 43 divided by 2. a decimal benchmark would be 42 divided by 2 because everyone knows that all even numbers are divisible by 2
Well first you have to listen and pay attention in class. You have to study really hard. And you have to pass the Benchmark too!! That is how I would pass the benchmark exam!......
It would be 0.05
To do benchmarks, you have to have a number of computers. Either you have to have physical access to the computers, or you have to write software to do it remotely and let others do the testing. Either way, a certain amount of money will be required. Without sufficient funds, your team would only have access to their own personal computers or what the lab already owns. Testing on less machines would mean the results are likely to be skewed or less reliable.
you put it over 1 for example: to make the number 5 into a benchmark fraction, you would turn it into 5/1
No because you would not use it as an estimate.
There are lots of benchmarks. Without knowing what benchmark you wanted to test on the processor, it would be impossible to give you its score. Even then, the benchmark is only useful if you have the score from other processors to compare it to.
Are there any answer choices? I would say 1,000.
aq mane taw
If you are referring to cooking the answer would be; SCORCHING
Yes