Yes, the presence of the same organisms on multiple continents suggests that at some point in the past, those continents were connected. This supports the theory of continental drift, which explains how landmasses have moved over time. The distribution of these similar organisms across different continents provides additional evidence for this theory.
No, regions and continents are not the same. Continents are large landmasses on Earth like Asia or Africa, while regions are smaller areas within continents that share common features like climate, culture or geography, such as the Sahara Desert region in Africa.
Istanbul is the only city that is located on two continents (Europe and Asia).
No, the positions of continents and oceans on Earth's surface have changed over millions of years due to the process of plate tectonics. Continents have drifted apart and collided to form new landmasses, changing the configuration of oceans. This movement is ongoing, with the positions continuing to shift gradually over time.
Both Australia and Antarctica are island continents, but they are not "islands". They are too big to beformallyclassified as an island. The world's largest island is Greenland.The reason why Australia and Antarctica are continents is because they sit on their own tectonic plates. This is different from Greenland, which uses the same land mass as North America. A place like Greenland shares the same geologic attributes as North America.Australia and Antarctica are the only two true Continental Islands. That is, they are separated from all other continents by water. All other continents are connected by a landmass to at least one other Continent. If there are any waterways, they have been artificially created.
The continents have not stayed in the same place because of the shifting of plate tectonics going past each other or crashing into each other. The process took millions of years.
Yes, and No. Historically, Europe and Asia are classified as separate continents even though they lie within the same landmass. However, alternative classifications have proposed a combined Eurasian continent, just as a combined Americas has been suggested in place of the traditional North American and South American continents.
the earths continents are the same ..
That they must have been joined up in the past because the same fossils could not exist on the continents given their current position.
That they must have been joined up in the past because the same fossils could not exist on the continents given their current position.
That they must have been joined up in the past because the same fossils could not exist on the continents given their current position.
I don't think it matters, but the first one is the old way to say the same thing. The 'alway' is the KJV usage and the addition of the 's' is how we say it these days. The meaning from the original Greek is entirely the same.
because if the same fossils were found in the same spot but on two different continents and if you put the continents together like a puzzle and the fossils were in the same spot, it would mean the continents drifted apart.
Yes, the presence of the same organisms on multiple continents suggests that at some point in the past, those continents were connected. This supports the theory of continental drift, which explains how landmasses have moved over time. The distribution of these similar organisms across different continents provides additional evidence for this theory.
so u can alway remember the number and be smart
What is the continents of asia are really parts of the same land mass?
The same size as all the continents combined