0
Scientists make more mistakes than not. It is part of the business and why they call their work "experiments". As a working scientists you try to keep your basics constant. You control the pH of your solutions, the don't switch suppliers for even basic salts mid-experiment. Most importantly you repeat experiments several times and use statistical analysis to support your conclusions.
The goal of scientist is to have his/her results confirmed by repetition by others. If it isn't reproducible than it isn't believable. But wrong conclusions....
Record your mistake in the results and talk about it in the conclusion/examination of data.
Record your mistake in the results and talk about it in the conclusion/examination of data.
When a scientist makes a mistake, that is also known as an error, which is the answer for the crossword puzzle.
error...
error...
error...
Experiments should be conducted in a manner that carefully controls all variables that may impact on the results. In this way, a researcher is able to have confidence in the results, and assure that the results are statistically valid, and repeatable. In other words, if an experiment is conducted and results are obtained, a researcher should be able to perform the experiment again under identical conditions and get results that are statistically comparable. Another way to assure that results are valid is for a different scientist to conduct the experiment under conditions as closely comparable to the original conditions as possible. If the experiment was run under conditions matched as identically as possible on each occasion, statistically similar results should be obtained. Researchers have increased confidence in the results of an experiment when other researchers are able to replicate the results obtained. Reliability of results gives researchers confidence that the results are not just random, but indicate a valid phenomenon.
Yes, they should... at least as a community of scientists. A specific scientist doesn't have to reproduce his work over and over, but other scientists in the field should check and make sure the experiment works for everyone, in case the other scientist missed something.
Yes, experiments should be reproducible to verify that the results are the same.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is it true scientists should not repeat experiments to see if thir data is reproducible?
no. experiments should be repeatd
Why do scientists repeat experiments?
Scientists repeat experiments for reliability. The experiment must be repeated for the scientist to develop a theory. One experiment does not prove your hypothesis correct; therefore, it must be done a several times.
Why do scientists repeat other researchers experiment?
Scientists repeat others' experiments to double check their findings as well as to find new information that might have been missed initially.
Why should scientists repeat their experiments?
They repeat them in order to try and see if it will fail. They may add or remove different variables depending on the results to see if something is effecting the experiment correctly or falsely. Start with a hypothesis and then test it and when you feel you are finished test it thats when the real testing begins.
What is it called when scientists do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance?
Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become
Is it true scientists should not repeat experiments to see if thir data is reproducible?
no. experiments should be repeatd
Scientists should not repeat their experiment to see if their data is reproducible?
No they shoudnt have.
Why might a scientists repeat an experiment?
Scientists repeat their experiments because to make sure that their results are correct.
Why do scientist do experiments over?
Scientists repeat experiments to test whether results are consistent and reliable.
Why do scientists repeat experiments?
Scientists repeat experiments for reliability. The experiment must be repeated for the scientist to develop a theory. One experiment does not prove your hypothesis correct; therefore, it must be done a several times.
Why might scientist repeat an experiment?
Scientists repeat their experiments because to make sure that their results are correct.
Why do scientists repeat other researchers experiment?
Scientists repeat others' experiments to double check their findings as well as to find new information that might have been missed initially.
What is the term used for scientists repeating their experiments in order to reduce error chance?
Repeat testing
Why do scientists repeat?
Scientists repeat experiments for reliability. The experiment must be repeated for the scientist to develop a theory. One experiment does not prove your hypothesis correct; therefore, it must be done a several times.
What is the primary reason scientists repeat the measurements they take during experiments?
Scientists repeat measurements during experiments to ensure the reliability and accuracy of their results. By taking multiple measurements, they can identify and account for any errors or inconsistencies in their data, leading to more robust and trustworthy conclusions.
Why do scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become?
Scientists encourage review and repetition of experiments to ensure the reliability and validity of their findings. By having others replicate their experiments, scientists can confirm that the results are consistent and not due to chance or bias. This process helps to strengthen the scientific community's understanding and confidence in the hypotheses proposed.
What is it called when scientist repeat experiments to reduce errors?
This practice is known as replication. By conducting multiple trials and replicating experiments, scientists can minimize errors and increase the reliability of their results.
