no hypothesis is explicit because it is just a guess ~.~
Wiki User
∙ 12y agono.because hypotheses you want to test if it is true or not
It shouldn't be always disprovable, because your hypothesis should be a educated guess, based on facts an other info.So....A HYPOTHESIS SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE DISPROVABLE.
Always.
Unlike a wild guess, a hypothesis is based on observations and it must be testable......:-) answer by hismejohn
a best educated guess
no.because hypotheses you want to test if it is true or not
It shouldn't be always disprovable, because your hypothesis should be a educated guess, based on facts an other info.So....A HYPOTHESIS SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE DISPROVABLE.
Yes; the null hypothesis, H0, always includes an equality. The alternative hypothesis, H1, is >, <, or does not equal.
Always.
YES!
No.
It is often possible to find an explicit formula that gives the same answer as a given recursive formula - and vice versa. I don't think you can always find an explicit formula that gives the same answer.
Unlike a wild guess, a hypothesis is based on observations and it must be testable......:-) answer by hismejohn
Almost always
a best educated guess
When scientists make observations, they always strive to be objective, precise, and thorough in documenting what they see. They use tools and techniques to enhance the accuracy and reliability of their observations. Additionally, scientists often repeat their observations to ensure consistency and validity of the data collected.
The hypothesis can never really be proven correct; that's why scientists always say that they are 99.9% sure about things. If you drop a pencil, it will most likely always fall, but there is the slight chance that someday, it won't fall. Things in science always change.