This is a bit of a toughy really. Scientific theory can be thought of as falling into one of 3 categories. 1. Law. This is something that is generally accepted by all of the scientific community or the vast majority of those within the specific scientific field. e.g. Newton's Laws of motion etc 2 Theory. This is widely accepted by most of the scientific community or large amount of those in a specific field although opposing theories may exist. 3. Hypothesis (literally meaning below thesis or lower than theory). Is generally a new discovery or procedure to be introduced to the scientific community. So, coming back to your question: The purest scientific theory would probably be defined as Law, thus being accepted by all or the majority of the scientific community. Hope this helps.
A scientific model can change if new evidence is found. If the new evidence that has been found contradicts the model or theory then a scientific model or theory can change.
A theory
Scientist use scientific methods to test the new theory. They also examine all the evidence to see if it supports the new theory. Scientist accept a new theory when many test and pieces of evidence support it.
If new observations are discovered that clash with the previous theory, then the theory will have to be revised.
how well existing scientific data are explained by the new theory.
They go through critical evaluation .
The merit of a new scientific theory is judged by the scientific community based on its ability to explain existing data, make testable predictions, and withstand rigorous scrutiny through peer review and replication of results. The theory's coherence, explanatory power, and ability to advance our understanding of the natural world are also important factors in determining its acceptance within the scientific community.
The Big Bang theory is widely accepted by the scientific community as the most plausible explanation for the origin of the universe. Evidence such as cosmic background radiation and the expansion of the universe supports the theory's validity. However, ongoing research and new discoveries continue to refine our understanding of the early universe.
This is a bit of a toughy really. Scientific theory can be thought of as falling into one of 3 categories. 1. Law. This is something that is generally accepted by all of the scientific community or the vast majority of those within the specific scientific field. e.g. Newton's Laws of motion etc 2 Theory. This is widely accepted by most of the scientific community or large amount of those in a specific field although opposing theories may exist. 3. Hypothesis (literally meaning below thesis or lower than theory). Is generally a new discovery or procedure to be introduced to the scientific community. So, coming back to your question: The purest scientific theory would probably be defined as Law, thus being accepted by all or the majority of the scientific community. Hope this helps.
If new observations are discovered that clash with the previous theory, then the theory will have to be revised.
A scientific model can change if new evidence is found. If the new evidence that has been found contradicts the model or theory then a scientific model or theory can change.
If new observations are discovered that clash with the previous theory, then the theory will have to be revised.
The scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the theory of evolution. It is considered the foundational framework for understanding the history of life on Earth and is supported by a wide range of evidence from fields such as paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy. Scientific understanding of evolution continues to evolve as new evidence and discoveries emerge.
No. It means that it was the best theory supported at the time it was formulated. Theories can change if new scientific evidence provides new information.
No. It means that it was the best theory supported at the time it was formulated. Theories can change if new scientific evidence provides new information.
When there wrong about there theory. Like for example , if a scientist creates a new theory, but research proved it incorrect.