Well, sometimes the answer is specific to the investigation, but you can usually produce a set of better results, by repeating the experiment at least 3 times. If the results are all similar, you can know that they are reliable, but if there is an anomaly, it is most likely, that that set of results are not accurate and you shouldn't use these when you produce your average. (if you decide to have an average. Hope this helps!
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
They will need to keep redoing it until everyone has the same answer
1. Its important because if you repeat you'll get consistent results. 2. That means if a scientist gets different results it means they did something wrong in the experiment
they have to make sure that their answers from the similar investigation because it might be wrong
Results get published.
Well, sometimes the answer is specific to the investigation, but you can usually produce a set of better results, by repeating the experiment at least 3 times. If the results are all similar, you can know that they are reliable, but if there is an anomaly, it is most likely, that that set of results are not accurate and you shouldn't use these when you produce your average. (if you decide to have an average. Hope this helps!
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
so you can try a different method and compare the results
They will need to keep redoing it until everyone has the same answer
1. Its important because if you repeat you'll get consistent results. 2. That means if a scientist gets different results it means they did something wrong in the experiment
they have to make sure that their answers from the similar investigation because it might be wrong
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
reporting the results
How do scientists usually communicate and defend the results of an investigation
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
repeating a investigation can help to confirm your results. If you try an experiment once, it could be wrong so try it again and repeat it to confirm the results.