The evidence that made you come to that conclusion. Remember that a hypothesis is an educated guess
glass and metal objects
i dont know i need to know that too! what would you put for "B"?
Here's an educated guess. It means that a body of evidence apparently supports a hypothesis, but more and stronger evidence is needed before the hypothesis can be taken seriously. The evidence that suggests the validity of the hypothesis may even be anecdotal, or general untested 'knowledge', or informally gathered. Some experimentation has to be done to try to refute the hypothesis. You would not want to put a lot of weight on the assumption that the hypothesis is absolutely true until you have exhausted, to the best of your ability, the possibility that it is false.
Actually, it is the strongest evidence for evolution. Without one fossil we would know from the DNA evidence that evolution has occurred and is occurring. It is in the DNA of organisms that we see the strongest evidence for common ancestry. The products of those genes are sometimes highly conserved down the ages. Ribosomes, the workbenches on which proteins are made, differ hardly at at between you and pets.
No, FBI agents can not tamper with evidence or hide the evidence. This is an illegal act and could put the FBI agent in jail for a very long time and they would lose their job.
You would find evidence
Betoken means to give evidence of. A sentence would be, 'A witness in the court case gave a betoken of evidence against the man charged in a rape case.'
The "instrument" of the crime. A murder weapon is a type of evidence called "real" evidence. Physical evidence is called "demonstrative evidence."
It would be reasonable to assume that they don't, given that the evidence for actual UFOs are, to put it mildly, lacking. Although the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, the only rational conclusion we can draw is that UFOs don't exist, and thus could not directly affect a community.
they would defend themselves by using solid evidence they have collected throughout there investigation. Evidence must be creditable to accept in the court of law. Crime scene investigators in order to maintain reliability must be certain and take every step of collecting evidence seriously. In this factor, experts also used to defend evidence findings from a crime scene. As long as the proper steps taken to collect the evidence to be able to test it then the crime scene investigator has done his or her job. The steps that would fir protocol are chain of custody is the evidence discovered the chain of custody starts. This would include who discovered and collected the evidence where it discovered and how it collected with the time and date. You have the photographs evidence for the location of the crime scene. Where the evidence located on the crime scene and objects that may be of use as evidence. There is the collection of the evidence, which as long as the guidelines followed to the last letter and times and dates put on the package without contamination then the evidence presented in court. The evidence put in a controlled environment until trial. There is the expert witness testimony, which used to defend the evidence creditability and how it relates to the trial. The expert witness can explain the findings of the evidence to show it is link to the defendant in the case.
Given the amount of evidence there are for dinosaurs i would have to conclude that yes they did exist and evidence is growing that birds are their living descendants. Barring any religeous beliefs that the fossils and other evidence was put there by some deity to confuse or trick us i can see no other reasonable explanation.
It really depends. Most jurisdictions will put a closed case's evidence in storage. Sometimes things get thrown out if space is an issue. In Los Angeles the evidence would have been put in storage. But as is true with many famous crimes, the evidence has a way of disappearing, philfered away for the sake of collectables and conversation pieces. So, officially the Manson evidence should be stored safely away, realistically, I'm not sure how much of it remains after 40 plus years after the fact.
You would need evidence of an open and obvious condition (photos of the dead tree on the car would work) or evidence of written or verbal notice to the landlord about the hazard (dead tree). Without that evidence your chances of prevailing are zero. If its a small loss - put it into small claims - insurer may pay at that point
There's good evidence that honey is safe and effective for cough in patients over 12 months old.
Dry riverbeds and certain chemical compounds that can only be formed in a wet environment.
an evidence would be inside of the house like how to fire started