While controlled experiments can offer compelling evidence to support a hypothesis or theory, not all ideas are tested this way.
Radio controlled refers to something that is controlled by remote means via radio frequency, such as radio controlled cars or planes. It is slightly different than remote controlled items which usually have a wire connection.
no the variables cant be controlled.
if the experement can be repeated and the same results made then the experement is controlled if not the experement is not controlled
experiment
is there any good evidence of that? Age and weight controlled.
controlled nuclear reactions of helium
Proof of possession of a controlled substance typically requires physical evidence such as drugs found on the person, in their belongings, or in their control. This evidence is usually gathered through a search conducted by law enforcement or through other means such as witness testimony or surveillance. Additionally, evidence like drug paraphernalia or residue can also support the charge of possession of a controlled substance.
Including a larger sample size of participants or conducting a randomized controlled trial would make the evidence stronger. Additionally, ensuring that the study design minimizes bias and confounding variables would enhance the strength of the evidence.
On 9/11 2001 the Twin Towers were destroyed by controlled demolition. The US government has claimed that the towers fell as a result of plane and fire damage but provide absolutely no valid scientific evidence whatsoever to support this theory. What evidence there is points only to the use of some form of controlled demolition.
Rigorously controlled experiments can provide evidence to support or refute a hypothesis, but they cannot definitively prove a hypothesis. Scientific hypotheses are continually evaluated, refined, and occasionally rejected based on new evidence and further experimentation.
Crime scene evidence is typically collected by forensic experts and taken to a crime laboratory for analysis. The evidence is carefully cataloged, documented, and stored under controlled conditions to ensure its integrity. The results of the analysis are then used in criminal investigations and court proceedings.
No, a scientific theory is not the same as a controlled experiment. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world based on a body of evidence, while a controlled experiment is a specific type of scientific investigation that manipulates variables to test a hypothesis. Theories are developed and supported by multiple experiments and observations over time.
There is no evidence that it was EVER used. Perhaps some people do use telepathy, but there are no controlled experiments that confirm that telepathy is even possible.
While controlled experiments can offer compelling evidence to support a hypothesis or theory, not all ideas are tested this way.
Al-Qaeda hit 2 planes (on purpose) into WTC1 & WTC2. On 9/11 2001 the Twin Towers (WTC1 & WTC2) were destroyed by controlled demolition. The US government has claimed that the towers fell as a result of plane and fire damage but provide absolutely no valid scientific evidence whatsoever to support this theory. What evidence there is points only to the use of some form of controlled demolition.
The hypothesis is supported by data from previous research studies, observational data, and controlled experiments. This data may include statistical analyses, graphs, tables, findings from literature reviews, and expert opinions. Additionally, the hypothesis may be supported by correlations, significant p-values, and reproducible results from multiple studies.