A conclusion is what the experimenter observes from the experiment andwhether your hypothesis was proven correct or not.While the theory is the facts that is known about the experiment
idk but whoever answered this ? b4 me are really dumband any way i need this / to b answered to.... i need it for hmwk
A hypothesis is a tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation. Basically, it's an educated guess to a question. Testing a hypothesis is the only way to prove this statement correct or incorrect. A scientist conducts an experiement, using constants and variables, and draws conclusions against the hypothesis. This will prove it to be true or untrue.
Gravity
GREAT physics experiment! Wood is an insulator in part because it is less dense, so once your foot feels the cool, it is being insulated from losing more heat. The Tile is dense and acts as a "HEAT SINK" it literally draws the heat out of the foot and stores it in the tile.
A scientist draws conclusions after analyzing.
A conclusion is what the experimenter observes from the experiment andwhether your hypothesis was proven correct or not.While the theory is the facts that is known about the experiment
idk but whoever answered this ? b4 me are really dumband any way i need this / to b answered to.... i need it for hmwk
A hypothesis is a tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation. Basically, it's an educated guess to a question. Testing a hypothesis is the only way to prove this statement correct or incorrect. A scientist conducts an experiement, using constants and variables, and draws conclusions against the hypothesis. This will prove it to be true or untrue.
Inductive reasoning
yes
deductive - which allows one to draw conclusions inductive - which allows one to expand on conclusions and logical - which draws on your own experiences
deductive - which allows one to draw conclusions inductive - which allows one to expand on conclusions and logical - which draws on your own experiences
Scientific Method Horse Isle Answer: Experiments
An archaeologist is a person who examines artifacts and draws conclusions about past human life through the study of material remains left by ancient cultures. They use scientific methods to analyze artifacts in order to understand the behaviors and lifestyles of past societies.
No real "scientist" believes that aliens exist, just as no real scientist 'believes' that aliens do not exist. That's just a simple fact that comes from simple definitions. A real 'Scientist' is an observer who draws conclusions from what he observes. His conclusions have nothing to do with opinion, faith, judgment, or what he believes or doesn't believe. No observation by astronomers, astrophysicists, cosmologists, biologists, physicists, or anyone else has provided any evidence yet that points to the existence of life outside of Earth, or any evidence that rules it out. So nobody has any scientific basis for 'believing' either way ... even though many people, including many scientists, have a strong hunch that it does exist.
Jumping to conclusions is a persuasive technique where the speaker or writer draws a hasty conclusion without considering all the facts or evidence. It can be used to manipulate an audience by presenting information in a way that leads them to a predetermined outcome without allowing for critical thinking or analysis.