Stars of the main sequence with masses about 9 times as large as our Sun will normally form supernovas, the cataclysmic explosion of the star.
When they near the end of their hydrogen-to-helium fusion cycle, the heat and pressure inside the star can begin further fusion reactions in various layers (helium-to-carbon, carbon-to-neon, neon-to-oxygen, oxygen-to-silicon, and silicon-to-iron). Eventually, however, the outward force of these reactions can no longer support the gravitational weight of the outer layers. When they collapse, they trigger an explosive compression and rebound that blows off a large proportion of the star's mass.
(see related question)
Chat with our AI personalities
First [may be partial] is: A Cephid Variable Star. Quasars and other Gamma Ray sources [colliding Neutron Stars, and 'coalescing' Pairs of Black Holes for example] are also closely related.
Hydrogen and helium. It's better to ask which two ELEMENTS make up the bulk of the stars, since ALL elements in a star are in the gaseous state.
No. Real stars do not points.
Scientists do not make "star fuel," and stars, for the most part are not fueled by carbon, anyway. Stars are mostly fueled by hydrogen which was formed in the very early history of the universe, shortly after the "Big Bang." To learn more about how stars formed and what make them "burn", you should go to a website like http://www.kidsastronomy.com/
Whatdid hubble conclude when he noted that light emitted from stars is shifting towards the red end of the electromagnetic spectrumA. The universe is expanding