There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
you use models to see probable outcomes, but they can also be inaccurate
The processes that scientists use in inquiry include posing questions, developing hypotheses, designing experiments, collecting and interpreting data, drawing conclusions, and communicating ideas and results.
Learning in the natural world does not start with memorizing scientific laws and theories. It starts with the child exploring those facts while playing.
Laws have been proven, theories have not
Marketing. Methods, Models and Theories
all theories don't become laws
The difference between models and theories is nothing hahahahahaha loser go look in your book
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
Theories and laws serve different purposes in science. Theories are explanations that integrate and explain data from various observations, while laws are concise descriptions of a particular phenomenon. Theories are more comprehensive and can be modified or refined with new evidence, whereas laws are typically more general and do not change. Thus, theories are not elevated to laws but can support them.
they are both speculative
economic models
the laws of motion
Yes, a theory can exist without a corresponding law. Theories are explanations or models that seek to describe a phenomenon, while laws are concise statements that describe a fundamental relationship between observable phenomena. Theories can incorporate multiple laws or principles but may not always have a single corresponding law.
In the scientific context, theories and laws serve different purposes. Theories are overarching explanations supported by a large body of evidence, while laws are concise statements describing natural phenomena. Theories do not "become" laws; they complement each other by providing explanations and descriptions in science.
Laws describe observed phenomena and relationships in nature, while theories explain why those phenomena occur based on tested hypotheses and evidence. Laws are more descriptive and specific, while theories are broader and provide a framework for understanding natural phenomena.