Birth weight in human babies is one good example. Too small and babies lose heat rapidly and are also prone to infectious disease. Too large and they endanger themselves and their mothers by the great difficulty they have passing through the birth canal. So, a small range of birth weights have been selected for and this remains stabilized by the constraints listed above.
When natural selection favors the intermediate version of a characteristic, it is referred to as stabilizing selection. It is the opposite of disruptive selection.
Stabilizing selection
Stabilizing selection.
That would be the Stabilizing Selection where there will me not a lot of genetic variation. The curve of the population allele frequency would be quite thin with the extreme being in the middle.
stabilizing selection
When natural selection favors the intermediate version of a characteristic, it is referred to as stabilizing selection. It is the opposite of disruptive selection.
Stabilizing selection
The three patterns of natural selection are directional selection, stabilizing selection, and disruptive selection. Directional selection favors individuals at one extreme of a trait distribution, stabilizing selection favors the intermediate phenotype, and disruptive selection favors individuals at both extremes of a trait distribution.
disruptive selection
Directional selection
Stabilizing selection.
stabilizing selection
It is stabilizing selection
They both decrease genetic variation .
stabilizing selection
It is against an extreme phenotypes arising in a population of organisms. Height in humans is under stabilizing selection so that the normally distributed height of humans, save some outliers, describes the standard Bell curve.
They both decrease genetic variation