0
What else can I help you with?
What is a method of proceeding from facts to a conclusion?
it ic called deduction
What are the three skills scientists use to learn about the world?
The two biggest ones are critical thinking and the power of observation. There is also deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning, which include inference and predicting.
What is a kind of logical thinking that goes from the specific to the general?
The kind of logical thinking that goes from the specific to the general is known as inductive reasoning. In this process, one observes specific instances or examples and then formulates broader generalizations or theories based on those observations. For example, if one notices that the sun has risen in the east every morning, they may conclude that the sun always rises in the east. Inductive reasoning is often used in scientific research to develop hypotheses and theories.
Inductive thinking begins with what and goes on to draw conclusions?
specific, facts, and evidence
What is a type of reasoning that is characterized by beliefs of right and wrong and that applies in thinking and in the Army problem solving model is defined as which type of reasoning?
ethical
Does inductive reasoning require creative thinking?
No. False.
Inductive reasoning requires creative thinking?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations, which may involve creative thinking to identify patterns, make connections, and generate hypotheses. Creative thinking can help in forming new ideas, insights, and possibilities that can lead to novel interpretations and conclusions through inductive reasoning.
What scientific reasoning includes?
Scientific reasoning requires a logical way of thinking based on gathering and evaluating evidence .There are two types of Scientific reasoning can be deductive or inductive.
What is a method of proceeding from facts to a conclusion?
it ic called deduction
How deductive and inductive reasoning are the same?
Deductive and inductive reasoning are both methods of logical thinking used to draw conclusions. They both involve making observations, forming hypotheses, and reaching conclusions based on evidence. However, deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general conclusions.
How do the two kinds of scientific reasoning differ?
Scientific reasoning requires a logical way of thinking based on gathering and evaluating evidence.
Can you Describe inductive reasoning and give an example of finding scientific truth by using inductive principles?
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that involves making generalizations based on specific observations. It involves moving from specific instances to broader generalizations. For example, observing that all observed metals expand when heated would lead to the generalization that all metals expand when heated, based on inductive reasoning.
Which option describes creative thinking most accurately conventional thinking lateral thinking linear thinking logical thinking?
Lateral thinking describes creative thinking as it involves reasoning that is not immediately obvious and seeks to explore different approaches or perspectives to solve problems or generate new ideas.
What is adventurous thinking?
here you can devise your own tools toward the solution of the problem like in creative thinking. This is similar to informal reasoning wherein one uses his everyday reasoning to solve some problems
Which type of reasoning is characterized by beliefs of right and wrong and that applies in thinking and in the army problem solving model?
Ethical reasoning is type of reasoning that is characterized by beliefs of right and wrong, and applies in the Army problem solving model. Other types of reasoning include deductive, inductive, and analogical.
What are the three skills scientists use to learn about the world?
The two biggest ones are critical thinking and the power of observation. There is also deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning, which include inference and predicting.
Which is an example of prejudice caused by inductive reasoning?
Just because most of the terrorists are Muslim, it does not mean that all Muslims are terrorists. Thinking all Muslims are terrorists shows an example of prejudice that is caused by inductive reasoning.
