Usually they start with the theory and work backwards.
as a scientist, people come up with a prediction (hypothesis) based on prior and researched knowledge. For example if the question was "Which makes a better conductor, iron or steel?"
You could answer:
a) probably the same because both are forms of metal
or
b) iron bbecause it is used for a as a conductor more often
dat not goood
2. When you observe something happening, you can come up with an idea that explains the observation.
e.g. 'road accidents are more common with higher speed'.
You can then set about testing the hypothesis, by gathering data, and seeing if your idea (= hypothesis) stands up to examination.
The trick of course is to find an alternative a priori hypothesis.
Find a hypothesis.
Reject the hypothesis.
When their hypothesis for the conducted experiment is accurate.
hypothesis?
You act and experiment according to your hypothesis and write observations.
The trick of course is to find an alternative a priori hypothesis.
Find a hypothesis.
Reject the hypothesis.
A hypothesis is what you think is going to happen.
When their hypothesis for the conducted experiment is accurate.
It really depends on what your hypothesis is! But I expect a hypotenuse could be more useful in this context. However, knowledge of the hypothesis, hypotenuse even, is not enough to enable you to find the perimeter.
A test performed to find out if a hypothesis is supported is called an experiment. This involves conducting controlled investigations to observe and measure outcomes to determine whether the hypothesis is valid.
Propose another hypothesis
hypothesis?
To find out if your experiment went as you as you predicted.
nJDKhgku<.hcuybku<hxukhcbugkx<.xjfhishfkhblkdj<fihgsjadk