Opinions regarding any field of science may indeed lead to solid scientific evidence or facts. Examples Based on the fossilized remains found at Pompeii, it may become an educated opinion that there are more fossils to be discovered. Hence the opinion may become a scientific fact if more fossils are found. To my knowledge scientific evidence generally does not derive from an uneducated opinion.
There are many scientific pieces of evidence that the pyramids in Egypt were built using advanced techniques still unknown to us. The opinion that there is a solution to the question of how the pyramids were built is supported by opinions derived from scientific observations.
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
Ancedotally normally refers to evidence that is based on less scientific evidence but evidence that appears to back up the stronger scientific evidence. It adds weight to scientific evidence but is not necessarily proven.
when the evidence is relatable
If it weren't, then it wouldn't be scientific.
The parts of scientific investigation are identifying a research question or problem, forming a hypothesis, gathering evidence, analyzing evidence.
Ancedotally normally refers to evidence that is based on less scientific evidence but evidence that appears to back up the stronger scientific evidence. It adds weight to scientific evidence but is not necessarily proven.
No. It is not.
Scientific laws are based on scientific experiments, scientific conclusions after exhaustive tests, and they are also based on formerly scientific discoveries and experiments. Scientific evidence without a conclusive proof may be a false evidence. Scientific evidence doesn't exist. Science is not based on evidences, but on real results originated from a theory. Results are solid, palpable, real and cannot be doubted.
There is no tangible scientific or religious evidence that can be used to factually conclude that the consciousness (soul) of a person has a subsequent ethereal existence outside of the body.
This would be an opinion, because it is merely a statement expressed based on observation by a bystander, not actual evidence that to verify if this statement is true or not.
No, there is no evidence that the two of them are related. However, there is some evidence that she was a supporter of his in the 2012 election cycle.
All claims of supernatural events and abilities comes from empirical and anecdotal evidence. There is no scientific evidence for any of it.
There was no scientific reasoning whatsoever in claims of witchcraft, because there is absolutely no scientific evidence that witchcraft exists or ever has existed.
There is no scientific evidence proving that ghosts exist.
The most widely accepted answer to this question is no, there is no scientific evidence that angels exist. There are some who believe that seeing science cannot disprove angels exist either, the evidence is inconclusive. This is known as the burden of proof.
1) No. 2) Science, when mangled by lawyers, is seldom scientific.
It is the consensus of scientific opinion that it is not possible to change the past.