answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why don't scientists accept the steady state theory?

Scientists do not widely accept the steady state theory because it does not align with observed evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the Hubble expansion of the universe. These observations strongly support the Big Bang theory, which is the prevailing cosmological model.


Do Jewish scientists believe in genesis or the big bang theory?

Many Jewish scientists believe in both Genesis and the Big Bang theory. They may see Genesis as a symbolic or metaphorical explanation for creation, while accepting the scientific consensus of the Big Bang theory as a scientific explanation for the origin of the universe. It is not uncommon for individuals to hold both religious and scientific beliefs simultaneously.


Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?

Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.


Is it true or false the Scientists accept ideas from the past but will revise them when new evidence is discovered?

true


Why did many scientists not accept the early theiories of continental drifts?

Alfred Wegener did not have the "HOW" factor- because of no evidence on the process, they could not believe his theory.


What do scientists think about the theory of evolution?

The scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the theory of evolution. It is considered the foundational framework for understanding the history of life on Earth and is supported by a wide range of evidence from fields such as paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy. Scientific understanding of evolution continues to evolve as new evidence and discoveries emerge.


Why are scientists more reluctant to accept Charles Darwin's theory?

Some scientists may be reluctant to accept Charles Darwin's theory of evolution due to their religious beliefs, lack of understanding or misinformation about the evidence supporting it, or simply because it challenges their current scientific paradigms. However, the overwhelming majority of scientists recognize and accept the validity of Darwin's theory based on the extensive evidence from various fields such as genetics, biochemistry, paleontology, and developmental biology.


Why is providing evidence to support your position an important part of building an argument?

Providing evidence to support your position is important because it adds credibility and persuasiveness to your argument. Evidence demonstrates that your position is based on facts and logic rather than unsupported opinions. It also helps your audience better understand and accept your perspective.


Will the judge accept money orders as proof of child support payment?

Maybe. It depends on all the other evidence, both oral and documentary, that is presented.


Why did scientists in 1915 not accept wegeners idea of continental drift?

Scientists in 1915 did not accept Alfred Wegener's idea of continental drift because he lacked a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's ideas were seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time, so there was resistance to accepting his theory without more concrete evidence. The technology available at the time also did not provide the necessary tools to support Wegener's hypothesis.


How can the Scientific Revolution be seen as a conflict between authority and evidence?

The Scientific Revolution was a conflict between authority and evidence. Authority came in the form of the Church, which did not want to accept new scientific ideas. Evidence came in the form of experiments and observations that scientists were coming up with that were proven true repeatedly.


What is the evidence that dinosaurs lived?

Their fossilized bones and tracks is the evidence we accept.