Wiki User
∙ 9y agoEach scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoWegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
why is it important that scientists know and accept their limitations?
probably when you can prove it
Any proposition can be denied by those who do not wish to accept it, no matter how strong the evidence is. However, evolution can not rationally be denied. Scientists say they regard it as fact.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
It is NOT scientifically disputed as the overwhelming number of scientists accept evolutionary theory. Those scientists, and others, that do not accept the theory do so for religiously ideological reasons, though they try to rationalize this by pseudo scientific proposals.
Scientists do not widely accept the steady state theory because it does not align with observed evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the Hubble expansion of the universe. These observations strongly support the Big Bang theory, which is the prevailing cosmological model.
Many Jewish scientists believe in both Genesis and the Big Bang theory. They may see Genesis as a symbolic or metaphorical explanation for creation, while accepting the scientific consensus of the Big Bang theory as a scientific explanation for the origin of the universe. It is not uncommon for individuals to hold both religious and scientific beliefs simultaneously.
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
true
Alfred Wegener did not have the "HOW" factor- because of no evidence on the process, they could not believe his theory.
The scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the theory of evolution. It is considered the foundational framework for understanding the history of life on Earth and is supported by a wide range of evidence from fields such as paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy. Scientific understanding of evolution continues to evolve as new evidence and discoveries emerge.
Some scientists may be reluctant to accept Charles Darwin's theory of evolution due to their religious beliefs, lack of understanding or misinformation about the evidence supporting it, or simply because it challenges their current scientific paradigms. However, the overwhelming majority of scientists recognize and accept the validity of Darwin's theory based on the extensive evidence from various fields such as genetics, biochemistry, paleontology, and developmental biology.
Providing evidence to support your position is important because it adds credibility and persuasiveness to your argument. Evidence demonstrates that your position is based on facts and logic rather than unsupported opinions. It also helps your audience better understand and accept your perspective.
Maybe. It depends on all the other evidence, both oral and documentary, that is presented.
Scientists in 1915 did not accept Alfred Wegener's idea of continental drift because he lacked a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's ideas were seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time, so there was resistance to accepting his theory without more concrete evidence. The technology available at the time also did not provide the necessary tools to support Wegener's hypothesis.
The Scientific Revolution was a conflict between authority and evidence. Authority came in the form of the Church, which did not want to accept new scientific ideas. Evidence came in the form of experiments and observations that scientists were coming up with that were proven true repeatedly.
Their fossilized bones and tracks is the evidence we accept.