Well, some scientists might think that science is better then religion, and go against it, some might think its bad, but just ignore doing anything, some might not care if its bad or not, and some might think its better then science. (Yeah maybe they just took the stupid job out of force!) Well that's my answer.
Making predictions & then testing them.
Making predictions & then testing them.
Making predictions & then testing them.
It formally defines what you are trying to prove - and more important what you should try to disprove.
identify the problem and what you want to try to prove or disprove. or something like that :D
Making predictions & then testing them.
Making predictions & then testing them.
Making predictions & then testing them.
Scientists were expected to conduct experiments to prove / disprove their hypothesis and theories.
It formally defines what you are trying to prove - and more important what you should try to disprove.
So far scientists have not been able to prove or disprove existence after death.
identify the problem and what you want to try to prove or disprove. or something like that :D
The first step is to decide on the purpose of the experiment. What is it that you are trying to prove or disprove.
Disprove.
An experiment can prove or disprove a hypothesis.
Sometimes they can either prove or disprove the belief system of a religion; or simply cast some doubt. Less central to man's existence
Disprove.