law
It is fair to say that the scientific method is always intended to produce better theories.
Science is based upon observation and reasoning. There are always new observations being made, and new reasoning being proposed. This leads to improvements in theories.
yes because theories are always changed when found new evidence
It is in the nature of science that new evidence can supersede old beliefs. Having said that, the ideas of people like Aristotle were not supported with the kind of evidence we have for modern scientific laws, and would not be called Laws.
No. Very few theories are completely accepted or rejected; most theories go through several iterations of modification and adjustment. Even the most ridiculous theory has at least SOME element of validity, and the best theories aren't 100% perfect.
Of course. Anything new has always been rejected by a conservative establishment.
The adverb in this sentence is "always."
law
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.
It isn't always completely different
Phrenology, which suggests that personality traits can be determined by the shape of someone's skull, is now rejected by the scientific community. The theory of spontaneous generation, which proposed that life could arise from non-living matter, has also been thoroughly debunked. Additionally, the geocentric model of the universe, which placed Earth at the center with all celestial bodies orbiting it, has been replaced by the heliocentric model.
Joan Miro
there is always second chances.
It is fair to say that the scientific method is always intended to produce better theories.
When someone hurts you completely and it is not your fault and you have always completely trusted this person.
A Loser!