The National Science Education Standards (NSES p. 23) defines scientific inquiry as "the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on the evidence derived from their work. Scientific inquiry also refers to the activities through which students develop knowledge and understanding of scientific ideas, as well as an understanding of how scientists study the natural world." The Science as Inquiry Standard in NSES includes the abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry and understanding about scientific inquiry.
Scientific inquiry reflects how scientists come to understand the natural world, and it is at the heart of how students learn. From a very early age, children interact with their environment, ask questions, and seek ways to answer those questions. Understanding science content is significantly enhanced when ideas are anchored to inquiry experiences.
Scientific inquiry is a powerful way of understanding science content. Students learn how to ask questions and use evidence to answer them. In the process of learning the strategies of scientific inquiry, students learn to conduct an investigation and collect evidence from a variety of sources, develop an explanation from the data, and communicate and defend their conclusions.
The National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) recommends that all K-16 teachers embrace scientific inquiry and is committed to helping educators make it the centerpiece of the science classroom. The use of scientific inquiry will help ensure that students develop a deep understanding of science and scientific inquiry.
DeclarationsRegarding the use of scientific inquiry as a teaching approach, NSTA recommends that science teachersRegarding students' abilities to do scientific inquiry, NSTA recommends that teachers help students
Regarding students' understanding about scientific inquiry, NSTA recommends that teachers help students understand
-Adopted by the NSTA Board of Directors
October 2004
ReferencesAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Is a scientific law an explaination of thing or events based on observations of an explariment
True. the theory is the proposed set of statements. When you have a law, it means it is the final and correct answer.
One example of scientific law, is The Law Of Gravity.
false
Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken.
A scientific law is based on many repeated correct experiments.
Is a scientific law an explaination of thing or events based on observations of an explariment
a phenomenon of nature that has been proven to invariably
a scientific theorie is the explanashon of of things or events based on mant observashons.a scientific law is a description of of nature based on many observations.
law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea
law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea
A scientific law is a statement describing observable phenomena. Laws are based on repeated observations and experimentation, so they are not typically "broken." If an event seems to contradict a scientific law, it may indicate a limitation in our understanding or a need to revise the law.
Scientific Law.
Scientific laws are based on scientific experiments, scientific conclusions after exhaustive tests, and they are also based on formerly scientific discoveries and experiments. Scientific evidence without a conclusive proof may be a false evidence. Scientific evidence doesn't exist. Science is not based on evidences, but on real results originated from a theory. Results are solid, palpable, real and cannot be doubted.
No, a scientific law cannot be demonstrated mathematically as mathematical proofs area form of rationalism (logical based) whereas scientific proofs are a form of empiricism (evidence based), so neither a mathematical law can be proved scientifically nor a scientif law be proved mathematically.
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
Superstitions do not have any scientific proof. It is purely based on individual beliefs.