Want this question answered?
Yes. Scientific theories, hypotheses or more generally conjectures must be testable capable of being proved false.
testable
Yes. Scientific theories, hypotheses or more generally conjectures must be testable capable of being proved false.
It is necessary for a hypothesis to have two things, the words IF and THEN. Another word can be added, BECAUSE. A successful hypothesis has to have all three.
capable of being proven false. testable
Yes. Scientific theories, hypotheses or more generally conjectures must be testable capable of being proved false.
testable
Yes. Scientific theories, hypotheses or more generally conjectures must be testable capable of being proved false.
It is necessary for a hypothesis to have two things, the words IF and THEN. Another word can be added, BECAUSE. A successful hypothesis has to have all three.
A hypothesis must possess capable of being proven false and testable in order to be considered to be scientific.
The most important feature of a scientific hypothesis is that it is testable. Another feature that is related is the attribute of being 'falsifiable', or otherwise capable of being proven incorrect. For instance, it's almost impossible to disprove 'there's intelligent life on other planets', and as such that would not work as a hypothesis.
Scientific law :)
capable of being proven false. testable
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
No. In fact, in statistics, an hypothesis is a statement whose truth is to be tested. In science, an hypothesis is a way of summarising a body of information that is capable of being shown to be false.
the hypothesis
Hypothesis is a guess with no proof. when proved, it is stated as phenomenon.