I'm not sure if 'prove' is the best word. Both of these cases brought attention to racial equality. And in the case of Simpson it doesn't matter the color of your skin, just the color of your money.
It depends on the state that you live in. If the state allows it, then you could consider emancipation, which means you prove to the court that you are capable of acting as a responsible adult. Emancipation also requires that you hold a job that can provide for your (and your child's) needs.
no prove of no dad, but also no prove he has a dad, all in all, dad is never mentioned.
Alfred Weneger was trying to prove his theory of Continental Drift. Many other scientists before him had the same theory, but they never could prove it. He had five pieces of evidence.
Yes she is christian does that prove your answer
The defense do not have to prove anything, if the prosecution fail to prove guilt, then the defendant is not guilty (in an ideal world). It may be the case thaat a jury may find guilt when a charge has not really been adequately proved to be true, but in this case the judge must direct them to find "not guilty" through lack of evidence.
Presentation of evidence and testimony to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The evidence was circumstantial and not enough to prove any guilt.
Retain an attorney and file a petition with the court to have your case re-opened on the basis of the discovery of exculpatory evidence tending to prove your non-guilt.
civil court
By using the power of nicolas cage
In court, the defense attorney argued that the evidence presented by the prosecution did not prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This raised doubts about the defendant's involvement in the crime, leading to an acquittal.
Completely . . what goes on in a courtroom , is a competition . . Attorney against Attorney . . one attorney trying to prevent the truth . . while the other attorney , attempts to reveal the truth __ The courtroom is just a place , is to determine , who wins and who loses . . . not to be confused with the Pursuit of Justice / right and wrong . . truth . . guilt or innocence __ The Court process is Adversarial , because, people are concerned with not - losing __ The price one pays , can be frightening __ Being adversarial is the opposite of Pursuing Justice __ thus our Legal system is merely a contest , to see who has the worst attorney . . which determines who is the loser
If you can prove that they are lying, you prove it on cross examination.Added: Then the person who was a proven liar couldbe charged with lying under oath and/or contempt of court.
Which person do the men bring to the court to prove to the judge that Abigail and the girls were sporting?
DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is a collection of your entire genetic code. You get half of your DNA from your mother, and half from your father. DNA is comprised of Adenine, Cytosine, Thymine, and Guanine. Some of the codes are responsible for your "genes". In court, DNA used as criminal evidence CANNOT prove guilt, but it can be used to HELP prove guilt. It CAN be used to prove innocence. DNA can be taken from spit, blood, semen, hair, fingernails, skin, pretty much anything on your body has DNA. If somebody commits a crime, he or she is likely to leave some form of DNA behind. It is a lot like fingerprints.
A court order.A court order.A court order.A court order.