Considering George Lucas set a new standard for technology used in film making, and brought surround sound to the big screen, having Star Wars: A New Hope, in theaters for 3 consecutive years, there is no comparison. Star Wars is a far greater movie trilogy then Lord of the Rings due to the fact that Star Wars set the standard for what movies are today. Without Lucas, there is no Jackson.
Ignoring surround sound. Which you can enjoy both without. You have to look at the movies themselves. There are screw ups in acting in SW as are there terrible actors. The plot got changed and there are still holes and questions waiting to be answered. On the other end of the question. The Lord of the Rings has amazing scenery, some of the best acting I've seen in a long time, and a cast of fantastic actors. The story is epic, deep, and profound. So in my own personal opinion I'd say The Lord of the Rings.
That boils down to personal taste, I myself prefer Star Trek. It's more of a flowing organised storyline as where stargate appears to be a shot out every episode.
No. Not at all. Star Trek is a COMPLETELY different franchise than star wars
The second season of Star Trek TNG was broadcasted from 1988 to 1989. The season consisted of 22 episodes. The second season was rated higher than the first one.
]It would also depend on which jedi, that makes a huge difference.They would probably shake hands and chat weather.==========Probably Q since the Q can manipulate everythingwhereas a Jedi can only man manipulate the Force - and only that to a limited degree.
Very famous, they are known worldwide and even those who don't like them have at some point heard of Harry Potter.
In general boxed Star Trek toys are worth more than the loose version. To get the highest prices, the toy must be new in the box, meaning they have never been opened or played with at all.
YES!
That question is opinion-based and therefore debatable. But personally, I believe Star Wars is loved more than Star Trek.
"Star Trek is better than Star Wars", is only a opinion. Both Movies Are a big Hit but i would have to go with Star Wars cause More people understand easier and just more fun to watch (opinion)
Yes Bridge commander is older than Legacy!
Star Wars. :) (don't believe me? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNxhrPaaCA4)star wars is better because it has more battle action, 100% better acting, 100% more relistic and is a better story and the new star trek movie (2008-09) realy suked they should just stop making star trek if there just going to make it boring and wird. even the movie gi joe was better than star trek.THAT is 100% believable, agreeable, and true.
No. Not at all. Star Trek is a COMPLETELY different franchise than star wars
Star Trek merchandise with less than $50 each item. Dear Sci-fi fans rejoice serious stellar action with this best Jean Luc Star Trek Picard cosplay guide.
This question is asking for peoples personal opinion and so can not be answered unbiasedly My personal opinion is that the new Star Trek film is worth seeing just to add the story of Spock's beginnings parallelled with a story that gives licence to Star Trek rewriting the Future history that has already been laid down through episodes past. (If you have seen the film then you will know what I mean)
I bemoan the fact that my friend draws better than me. Star Trek fans will likely bemoan the limited access to the new TV series.
Babylon 5
The second season of Star Trek TNG was broadcasted from 1988 to 1989. The season consisted of 22 episodes. The second season was rated higher than the first one.
]It would also depend on which jedi, that makes a huge difference.They would probably shake hands and chat weather.==========Probably Q since the Q can manipulate everythingwhereas a Jedi can only man manipulate the Force - and only that to a limited degree.