12.5 million
He has 356.365.366 dollars.
It varies because of the different movies he has to play, but it's approximately 160.
he said he was paid 4.5million, and his contract said he was supposed to get $8mil for the second movie, but they had a choice of casting him or not. So they ended up offering him only 1mil for the second movie
Yes, he is in this film. He plays a character called Reed Richmond.
1965
12.5 million
He has 356.365.366 dollars.
He has 356.365.366 dollars.
A LOT. too much to even name.
It varies because of the different movies he has to play, but it's approximately 160.
he said he was paid 4.5million, and his contract said he was supposed to get $8mil for the second movie, but they had a choice of casting him or not. So they ended up offering him only 1mil for the second movie
Yes, he is in this film. He plays a character called Reed Richmond.
Yes, and no. It depends on how much he is being offered to star in the role. and also, how ever much they make for that movie, goes to the box office of the movie. Not much of it goes to the actors.
No. Absolutely not. I imagine that seeing the "Chaplin," you'd make that misconception. But no, the two are just dead ringers. Even Geraldine Chaplin, the daughter of Chaplin saw a parallel between the two.But I'll give you this much--he was born to play Charles Chaplin. The best role of his entire career. Still, in a strange way...Yeah, I guess... he is...
how much profit did tesco make last year
He won't last the season