Only those listed in the judgment can be held accountable. If the creditor motions for the court to hold another party responsible, and sufficient reason is given, say the other party has possession of property that is security against the debt, then it is possible. At that point the other party can be added to the judgment and help responsible.
The basic assumption is that yes, the spouse is jointly responsible. It is assumed that both spouses will benefit from the transactions.
yes they are both responsible for jobs, and supporting each other
If the debt is valid and proper legal procedures according to state laws is followed a judgment will be granted if the plaintiff wins the lawsuit (they will). Whether the joint bank account can be levied or other property attached by a lien or even a forced sale, depends on state laws and how the property is titled. For example, if you live in a TBE state, a judgment cannot be levied against a joint marital account, although the creditor might still try. If you reside in a community property state most debts are considered joint and both spouses are responsible, regardless of who is the account holder.
No, the differences in laws governing the execution of a creditor judgment does not allow for the enforcement of such in countries other than that which the judgment was entered.
Yes they do
The basic assumption is that yes, the spouse is jointly responsible. It is assumed that both spouses will benefit from the transactions.
yes they are both responsible for jobs, and supporting each other
No.
The other person becomes solely responsible, if one party has filed bankruptcy and is no longer responsible for it. If both parties file bankruptcy within a relatively short time of each other then neither of you will be responsible for the amount owed. * The exception would be if the judgment has been "perfected" as a lien against real property. In such a case the judgment creditor becomes a secured creditor and the judgment will not be dischargeable under bankrupcy law.
The frontal lobe is primarily responsible for judgment in the brain. It controls reasoning, decision-making, problem-solving, and other higher cognitive functions. Damage to this area can lead to impaired judgment and decision-making abilities.
In New York, spouses are generally not responsible for each other's separate debts. However, debts incurred during the marriage may be considered marital debt, and both spouses may be responsible for that debt, regardless of which spouse incurred it.
YES with qualifications. Joint assets will be considered as valid for liquidation to meet debt incurred only by one of the spouses.
Oregon is not a community property state. Therefore the surviving spouse is only responsible for the deceased spouse's medical bills if he or she entered into a financial agreement with the attending hospital and/or physicians or other such agencies.
In South Carolina, spouses are generally not responsible for debts that are solely in the other spouse's name. However, if the debt was incurred for household necessities or was jointly agreed upon, both spouses may be held liable. Consulting with a legal professional for guidance on your specific situation is recommended.
Well, it looks like English... I guess the answer is yes.
Debt collection can be attempted against joint propertyeven though only 1 person was physically involved in the event that brought about the civil suit / award. Note that various states in the USA have some difference in statutes that deal with collection actions against joint property.
Hades' only spouse is Persephone.