It is a very good idea to withhold information from the reader. But you do not want to withhold too much. Because the reader could become so confused, they throw the book across the room. What you want to do is withhold just enough information to cause the reader to want to find out more thus to turn more pages. But then in turn, If you tell the reader everything up front why would the reader continue reading the book to the end? They wouldn't need to.
A writer of creative nonfiction might leave out some details to maintain the flow of the narrative, protect the privacy of individuals involved, or streamline the focus on the main themes or messages of the piece. Omissions can also create intrigue or invite reader interpretation, enhancing the overall impact of the writing.
Oh yes, authors often withhold information from readers. There are a number of reasons for this. Readers have some intelligence, and can figure out some things for themselves; indeed, many readers would feel insulted if an author told them too much, implying a lack of intelligence on the part of the reader (unless, of course, the book was written for very young children, who prefer to be told everything). Furthermore, some information would simply not be interesting. Readers do not need to know everything in order to understand what they are reading. And in addition, the lack of information in some cases is used to create an artistically interesting ambiguity. The fact that a given piece of literature can be interpreted in more than one way can itself add to the interest of the writing. So there are a number of reasons to withhold information.
Compression
This is called "show, don't tell" in writing. It involves highlighting significant details that drive the plot or character development, allowing readers to engage and interpret the story for themselves. By leaving out unnecessary details, the writer can create a more immersive and thought-provoking experience for the reader.
Let me help you out with this one. You would say shut up fool, leave me alone. Now that's creative.
The writer's parents left him with his grandmother when he was just a baby.
All three Jonas Brothers are very creative...it's so hard to pick the two most creative ones. Joe is a definite, but I can't decide whether Nick is more creative than Kevin or not...you know what, why don't we leave that answer up to you?
The details of the will are not in the public domain.
You can't... It sucks right? IF you are in Creative mode though, they will leave you alone.
Restate the main points and leave the writer with something to think about.
I am sure that Chester did because he is the song writer.
Leave the planning to the experts! Hire an events organizer to help you plan your next event so you do not leave out any details.
The reason given is she did not get along with the cast. No other details given.
To me this leaves the impression that the writer is not that well educated. It can also leave the feeling of confusion if the writing is hard to understand because of errors in grammar.