0
No. Shakespeare writes prolifically on his lover. Although he does not his lover in high esteem, he seems to have enduring love for her.
There is no concrete evidence to suggest that King James I and William Shakespeare were lovers. While there were rumors and speculation about their relationship, it remains a topic of historical debate and interpretation.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did William Shakespeare have another lover?
We don't know that Shakespeare had any lovers apart from his wife. (She was certainly his lover before she married him.)
What royalty did shakespeare live to know about?
Shakespeare lived from1564 to 1616. He lived under Queen Elizabeth I and then King James I.When King James honoured their acting company, The Lord Chamberlain's Men, they changed its name to The King's Men. When James expressed an interest in Scottish history and witches, the play Macbeth was rapidly knocked out and performed.this answer doent help to answer my question "shakespearean royalty"
Who nwas on the throne when Shakespeare was around?
James I was King of England when Shakespeare died, on the 23rd April 1616. It is widely accepted that this was Shakespeares birthdate and deathdate, though there are no official records to confirm this. He was 52 years old.
What was king James know as?
Before becoming King James 1 of England, he was King James VI of Scotland.
How does Shakespeare use personification to signal the turning of the plot form romance to tradgey?
shakespeare uses act 2 scene 3 to change the overall mood from two lovers story to two lovers who are going to die.Also read the prologue to understand what i mean.
What is coldplay's lovers in japan about?
This song is about how the king-whom we can know in Viva la vida,fall down
What did King James do with the witches?
hahaha i dont know
Why would Shakespeare have written a play with witches for King James?
The theory is that King James, having earlier in his life written a book about witches, would be especially interested in a play which included them. You should know, however, that Shakespeare did not add the witches to the story, since they were already in his source, saying word-for-word what they say in the play. So it seems likely that if the play was intended to please King James (a statement far from certain) it was the Scottishness and connection with James's family which would have sold the story, and the witches just came with the package. Indeed Shakespeare had already written a play with witches (or at least one witch) many years before James came to the throne (Henry VI Part II). One of the interesting things about the idea that Macbeth was written to please James is the fact that there is no record of it being performed at court in any of the court-records of plays performed there. The only performance we know of was at the Globe.
Copyright for King James revised bible?
The original King James Bible has a Crown copyright. In England there are regulations on it, but not in other parts of the world. I do not know anything about the King James revised bible, but I do know that the King James does not need revised. for more information, see http://av1611.com/kjbp/. Thank you, I hope this helps in your search for answers. Christ is the Answer www.charitybaptistbillings.com
Did King James 1 know shakespeare?
No, due to how rich King james was and how not rich Shakespeare was. They would not be personally acquainted, as kings did not mix with players socially. But the King certainly had heard of Shakespeare since he was a huge fan of the drama and had sponsored the playing company of which Shakespeare was a prominent member. They would have pass by each other but not have a proper conversation.
What town was named after King James?
The town that was named after King James is Jamestown. I know because history is my favorite subject in school and i am only in 3rd grade
Did William shakespeare help translate the bible?
No, William Shakespeare did not help translate the Bible. The most famous English translation of the Bible, the King James Version, was completed in 1611, during Shakespeare's lifetime. However, there is no evidence to suggest that Shakespeare was involved in the translation process.
