Tom Walker can be considered morally worse than the other prominent Puritans due to his greed, immorality, and unethical actions, such as his deal with the devil. The other Puritans, despite their flaws, upheld certain moral standards and principles that Tom Walker ignored in pursuit of personal gain.
Puritans were generally pessimistic in their worldview, believing in the concept of original sin and emphasizing the idea of predestination. They believed that humans were inherently sinful and that only a select few were chosen by God for salvation, leading to a focus on introspection, self-discipline, and living a morally upright life.
One expression describing a person who pretends to be morally better than he really is is "a whited sepulchre".
They had a better geographical location
that they were all better than everyone.
He's not.
are you from ms gardezi's class?
The Puritans wanted to "purify" the Church, but the Church would not let them.
I would go with phony, hypocrite, pharisee, liar, or poser.
The Puritans were more successful than the Jamestown colonists because they had a stronger sense of community and purpose, emphasized agriculture and self-sufficiency, and were able to establish better relations with the Native Americans in the region. Additionally, the Puritans had a more organized and structured settlement plan compared to the profit-driven motivations of the Jamestown colonists.
Being morally good helps create a more harmonious society by fostering trust, cooperation, and empathy among individuals. It also contributes to one's own sense of self-worth and fulfillment, leading to a happier and more meaningful life. Ultimately, being morally good is a way to positively impact others and make the world a better place.
A better question: is "Why consider the bible to God?" an English sentence?
It's better than nothing, but the ethically responsible thing to do is allow same-sex marriage.