The body starts to acumulate energy like fat. So, the result is a overweight from the increase of fat tissue.
They require less energy as they do not do much work compared to teenagers. They should have less energy intake and less energy expenditure.
This statement is incorrect. When energy balance in the body is positive (caloric intake exceeds caloric expenditure), body mass increases. To decrease body mass, energy balance must be negative (caloric intake is less than caloric expenditure).
Losing weight is neither that tough nor that restrictive. Losing weight is all about eating right exercising. It lies in a basic physics law-energy intake should be less than energy expenditure.
Net energy expenditure is more important because it represents the energy that is actually available for the body to use after accounting for energy lost as heat during metabolism. Gross energy expenditure includes all energy expended, both useful and wasted, providing a less accurate picture of the body's true energy needs. Focusing on net energy expenditure helps in understanding how much energy is actually available to fuel physiological processes and activities.
Because if your not in taking energy your body will store whatever you eat to use for energy. So basically anything you eat your body will hold on to it to keep it functioning. And you will end up losing muscle which is not good
you have less energy
You will lose energy and weight. . . and you will be hungry
the motor will run with full efficiency as designed. No resistance means less energy expenditure. motor doesn't have to compensate for in line obstruction.
it will move slower.
you gain weight
Usually the other way around ... it's a question of the rate of energy expenditure.