They're is a contraction of "they are". There is a place name substitute. The correct sentence is "They're (they are) going to the store".
David and you is correct. Easy way to remember is to make both singular in a sentence. You would say.. David is going to the store. You are going to the store. Not... David is going to the store. Yourself is going to the store. So when you combine the two they must make sense just as you would speak. David and you are going to the store. Hope this helps.
A sentence fragment is an incomplete sentence. For example these have periods, but are not sentences:I wanted. We were. When I was there. While he was in the store. If you had.
Wasn't is singular, weren't is plural. If the subject of the sentence is just one person or object, then use wasn't. If the subject of the sentence is plural, use weren't."Sarah wasn't going to the store.""He wasn't going to the store.""John and Wanda weren't going to the store.""They weren't going to the store."
I am assuming the question is, "Is this correct?" It is almost correct. The only real error is that there is not a period after "store" to end the first sentence. While there is nothing ungrammatical about this sentence, many people feel that it is more polite to refer to yourself second: "Would you like to come along with him and me?" In addition, it is probably more common to say, "Would you like to come along with us?" This is a smoother, more concise sentence.
Yes, "He" can be the complete subject of a sentence. For example, in the sentence "He is going home," "He" is the complete subject because it tells us who or what the sentence is about and is followed by the verb "is going."
No you'd have to say my family and I are going to the store.
No, "The bicycle in front of the store" is a phrase, not a complete sentence because it lacks a subject and a verb to form a complete thought.
Whether you are using the contraction I'm, or the long form, I am, this would appear at the beginning of a sentence or a phrase within a sentence, and not at the end. Here is a normal sentence: I am going shopping. If you instead were to say, Going shopping, I am, you wind up sounding like Yoda. And if you said going shopping, I'm, that would sound even worse. As an answer to a question it would sometimes be possible to use "I am" as a complete sentence. Who is making that noise? I am. That works. But you would never say "I'm" as a complete sentence. That would not sound right, even though it technically has the same meaning as the long form.
Yes, it is an interrogative sentence. So the only thing that is missing is a question mark.
To change an interrogative sentence into a declarative sentence, you can simply remove the question word (who, what, where, when, why, how) and rephrase the sentence as a statement. For example, change "Are you going to the store?" to "You are going to the store."
You would say Pat and me at Cisco's. Whenever you are adding another person in a sentence with me or I, you can check yourself by taking out the first name. It will make since if it was grammatically correct. Ex: Kyle and me are going to the store or me is going to the store. Both these sentences are incorrect. You would say- Kyle and I are going to the store or I am going to the store.
"Am" can be used as a contraction for "I am" in a sentence. For example, "I am going to the store" can be shortened to "I'm going to the store."
They're is a contraction of "they are". There is a place name substitute. The correct sentence is "They're (they are) going to the store".
No
as in : I am going TO the store, are you going TO eat your hot dog
We are going to the store, and we are going to the mall.