That is the correct spelling of "amongst" (form of among).
There is chaos among us.
The correct spelling of the preposition is amongst, a mostly archaic variation of among.
In the given sentence, the personal pronoun 'us' is functioning as the object of the preposition 'among'.
"Nobody among us is..." is correct. "Nobody among us are..." is wrong. Although "us" is plural, the actual subject of your sentence is the word "nobody," which is always treated as singular. You will hear many people say "nobody among us are...," but it is always incorrect.
There is no difference between amongst and among. One can use these words interchangeably. Amongst is more of an "old-fashioned" way of saying among. However, among is more popular to use.
He is amongst us in the fight.
This is a matter of taste and preference. Many consider 'amongst' to be archaic and sanctimonious. Among will work just fine.
Bear in mind that the word amongst is just a British variation on the word among, and means the same thing. (It's much the same with the words while and whilst). So, as an example, there are criminals amongst us, beware!
amongst is the british standard spelling. if you are an american and live in american stay away from amongst and just say among
Amongst is more posh from England but among is from the USA.
That is the correct spelling of "amongst" (form of among).
There is no difference between amid and amidst or among or amongst. amidst and amongst are the obsolete words already replaced by amid and among, however in some cultures these words are still preserved.
Yes, "amongst" is a less common variant of "among" in British English. Both words are prepositions that indicate being surrounded by or in the midst of a group.
True
In the middle of them both, or interAmong or amongst. Among is usually plural but is acceptable as singular in English. Amongst has no significant difference.
What time is it in france