Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable
When someone calls a statement a "valid assumption" they mean that it is probably true.
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
An argument that is strong, sound, and valid is a cogent one.
Valid sources are materials used to back up a position, whether in speeches, writing or other kinds of debatable subjects. Good judgment is necessary when looking for a valid source as the Internet has made information overload an issue when researching.
No, it is not a definition: it is an imperative statement requiring you to do something!
Valid refers to something that is sound, reasonable, or convincing according to established rules or principles. It indicates that an argument or statement is logically and factually accurate.
Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable
You would have knowledge of a valid UCC since you would need to sign it.You would have knowledge of a valid UCC since you would need to sign it.You would have knowledge of a valid UCC since you would need to sign it.You would have knowledge of a valid UCC since you would need to sign it.
cheese
When someone calls a statement a "valid assumption" they mean that it is probably true.
No, it is not valid because there is no operator between P and q.
A faulty generalization is a statement that's not true while a valid generalization is a true statement.
no it does not complt with the definition of a cheque and its not a valid negotiable instrument
The ending of the fixed period for which a contract is valid.
If it is legally valid, then simply restate the above statement in court.
Valid - adjective Sound, Just, Well founded. It is a description saying that the noun being described is well founded, or sound.