The helping verb is will; the main verb is eat.
The verb phrase in the sentence "That dog will eat everything you set in front of it" is will eat.
eat is already a strong verb (verb which forms its past tense without enclitic '-ed'): I eat, I ate; walk is weak: I walk, I walked; but 'go' is strong: I go, I went. The strongest word for EAT is gobble, munch, chew,and...
eat. Well it depends on what you mean. 'Hot fudge' doesn't have a verb form this phrase is and adjective + noun and neither of these words have verb forms. But you could say: I eat hot fudge - verb = eat They cook hot fudge - verb = cook
The verb phrase in the sentence "That dog will eat everything you set in front of it" is will eat.
No, "eat" is a verb. It describes the action of consuming food.
No, the word "eat" is not an adverb.The word eat is a verb, because it is an action. As in "to eat something".
Yes. "Will eat" is a verb phrase, qualifying it as a verb in the future tense.
The helping verb is will; the main verb is eat.
Eat is a verb, should is a modal verb.
a transitive verb is any verb that redirects its action onto an object. eg Lions eat. the verb eat is not transitive because it has no object Lions eat prey. the verb eat is trnasitive because it has an object - prey,
The verb for "to eat like an animal" is "devour."
The verb phrase in the sentence "That dog will eat everything you set in front of it" is will eat.
eat is already a strong verb (verb which forms its past tense without enclitic '-ed'): I eat, I ate; walk is weak: I walk, I walked; but 'go' is strong: I go, I went. The strongest word for EAT is gobble, munch, chew,and...
The verb from which the noun eater is derived is eat.
Ate
eat. Well it depends on what you mean. 'Hot fudge' doesn't have a verb form this phrase is and adjective + noun and neither of these words have verb forms. But you could say: I eat hot fudge - verb = eat They cook hot fudge - verb = cook