Why is language defined as an arbitrary system of vocal symbols?

Answer 1

Human languages are arbitrary by nature: There is no reason why a furry domestic animal that purrs should be called cat, and not blop or fleechtafly.

The fact that different languages use different words to describe the same thing is, in itself, a proof of arbitrariness.

Grammatical structures are just as arbitrary; for instance, the English language uses mainly a subject-verb-object structure while the German language puts verbs at the end of the sentence, etc.

Answer 2

There are many incorrect definitions of language, and this is one. Some language is not vocal. And "arbitrary" symbols would be unintelligible to anyone except the person making them up. Better to define language as a complex system of symbols used to convey meaning, feeling and intent. Still not a complete definition, but at least it is not wrong.

Answer 3

Language is arbitrary because in every language the sounds do not relate to the words' meanings. Even the sounds of the word arbitrary have no connection to its meaning.

Answer 4

It is subject to individual will of judgement without restriction. Use decided by one's own discretion