Machine Language is the lowest level language other than microcode as it is what the processor itself uses to handle operations. Assembly is low level as it is very close to machine language. Higher level languages have higher levels of abstraction and more structure to them, such as C++. Lower level languages are very operation based.
Assembly languages are low level because there is minimal abstraction between the code you write and the machine code produced by the assembler. The relationship is near 1:1 and is machine-specific. High-level languages have a much higher degree of abstraction and are generally machine-independent (portable). That is, you write code to suit the language compiler or interpreter, very rarely specific to the machine itself. However, the term high-level specifically means that the code is highly abstract, more human-friendly. A single high-level statement can emit dozens of low-level instructions that would otherwise have to be written by hand using assembly language, which is understandably tedious and prone to human error.
Machine-dependent (generally called "platform-dependent")
High-level languages are easy to read and write. They are not machine dependent and portable from one computer to another. Assembly languages are machine dependent, easier to read than machine code but it's still not easy to read, and the assembler program translates the assembler program straight into machine code.
Yes. Both first and second generation languages are machine-dependent. The first generation of languages were machine code, while the second were assembly languages. Non-machine dependency came about with the advent of the third-generation of languages, all the high-level languages.
The programs written in Machine codes (like hexadecimal codes) are the Low level programs. These are understood only by the Microprocessor they are written for and written on. Whereas the High level programs are written in English like languages which are human redable.
High level languages are easier for humans to read and program in. They are usually machine independent, and most have a wide variety of programming libraries available for common functions. Low level languages are usually machine specific, such as assembly languages. They lack programming libraries.
Assembly languages are low level languages, sometimes also called machine-level languages.
Machine-dependent (generally called "platform-dependent")
Misunderstanding. There are no 'middle level languages', only low and high level languages. Machine code and assembly are the former, everything else is the latter.C is often called a middle-level computer language as it combines the elements of high-level languages with the functionalism of assembly language. But actually it doesn't have any Assembly-like feature (whatever that means).
High-level languages are easy to read and write. They are not machine dependent and portable from one computer to another. Assembly languages are machine dependent, easier to read than machine code but it's still not easy to read, and the assembler program translates the assembler program straight into machine code.
HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGE The program weitten in English language which eassier to understand by user is called high level language. ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE The program written in symbolics form is called assembly language. In which the symbols are used like sub,mul,div, etc.it also called symbolic language. DIFFERENCE HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGE ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE 1) It is a source code. 1) It is a object code. 2) It is convertd in machine 2) It is convertd in machine language using compiler. language using assemblier.
Yes. Both first and second generation languages are machine-dependent. The first generation of languages were machine code, while the second were assembly languages. Non-machine dependency came about with the advent of the third-generation of languages, all the high-level languages.
The term high-level refers to the amount of abstraction between the code you write and the native language of the machine. Low-level code is a symbolic code that maps 1:1 with the machine code, thus assembly is a low-level language. All other languages that employ a compiler or interpreter to create the machine code are considered high level languages. However, C and C++ are examples of high-level languages that also allow low-level programming, and are often called mid-level languages for that reason.
Yes, that is correct. Second-generation languages, also known as assembly languages, provide a low-level interface between software and hardware. They use mnemonic codes and symbolic names to represent machine code instructions, making programming closer to the hardware level compared to high-level languages.
The programs written in Machine codes (like hexadecimal codes) are the Low level programs. These are understood only by the Microprocessor they are written for and written on. Whereas the High level programs are written in English like languages which are human redable.
High level languages are easier for humans to read and program in. They are usually machine independent, and most have a wide variety of programming libraries available for common functions. Low level languages are usually machine specific, such as assembly languages. They lack programming libraries.
Assembly language is low-level because it has the least amount of abstraction between the source and the resultant machine code. That is, the translation from assembly language to machine code is 1:1. All high-level languages have much higher degrees of abstraction.
Generally languages are used for communication, In the case of computers languages are used to communicate with the Hardware. Language consist of set of rules and syntaxes to frame the valid instructions to work with the Machines.