A compiler is a program that takes a programming language like that of java and then translates it into computer language for the software user. The interpreter just ( just like that of a human interpreter) takes the foreign language which would be that of the programming language and turns it into the machine code. Both of these programs take a high-level programming language and translates them into the machine code, but the interpreter is slower to translate than the compiler because of the fact it processes and interprets each statement many times.
Chat with our AI personalities
According to me compiler is better as it reads the whole program at one go and shows all the errors simultaneously (whereas interpreter reads one line at a time and shows the error one by one if any)..
-Shruti Jainbecause the compiler convert whole of the sentence once into the machine langauge but the interpreter convert one by one
in my personal point of view i would say a parser is more like "one-directional" "automatic" vs. an interpreter, the interpreter has more "intelligence"
a compiler translates an entire program and then executes it while an interpreter translates and executes one line of a program at time
Due to platform independence, a Java compiler will interpret Java source code into Java Byte Code and pass to the JVM, which will pass machine understandable code through to cpu. (clarification needed).A conventional compiler converts source code directly to machine code.(clarification needed).
Hybrid compiler is a compiler which translates a human readable source code to an intermediate byte code for later interpretation. So these languages do have both features of a compiler and an interpreter. These types of compilers are commonly known as Just In-time Compilers (JIT). Java is one good example for these types of compilers.