I believe it has something to do with the articulatory aspect (as opposed to other's acoustic and perceptual classifications).
> No, it is not. This is a hierarchy of formal grammars that rule the production of (human, computer, nature, etc.) "assertions". This approach is focused on a generative view of the meaningful sentences: each one of those could be generated by rules defined by a grammar, or syntactical rules. The classification is ordered by levels of expressiveness and complexity. See the related link on Wikipedia for further information.
Chat with our AI personalities
The major advantages of fifth generation programming languages are that these languages are improved from fourth generation languages. It is also important to note that classification of programming languages in generations beyond the second generation is complete nonsense and nothing but a marketing hype; programming languages don't evolve in a linear succession, or one in the shape of a balanced tree, where each generation has common attributes and improvements over the previous generation.
the example of classification
classification of concrete blocks
There is only a slight difference between discrimination and classification in data mining. Discrimination can be negative and classification is generally just factual.
It is programming languages is.