A brief description allowing the reader to identify the image and its significance, and a figure number correlating to the sequence of images in the book
tn = t1+(n-1)d -- for arithmetic tn = t1rn-1 -- for geometric
<html> <script language="vbscript"> n=cint(inputbox("Enter a number")) dim f f=1 if n<0 then Msgbox "Invalid number" elseif n=0 or n=1 then MsgBox "The factorial of given number "&n&" is :"&f else for i=n to 2 step -1 f=f*i next MsgBox "The factorial of given number "&n&" is :"&f end if </script> </html>
the answer is blepmor unsrcamble it to find it out
Store the numbers in a suitable container such as an array. Assume the first number is the smallest and assign its value to a local variable. Traverse the remainder of the sequence, comparing each element's value to the stored value. If an element has a lower value, assign its value to the local variable. When the sequence is fully traversed, the local variable will hold the value of the smallest value in the sequence. Return that value.
To determine the missing numbers in the sequence 70 -- 84, we need to identify the pattern between the two known numbers. The difference between 70 and 84 is 14. To find the missing numbers, we need to continue the pattern of adding 14 to the previous number. Therefore, the missing numbers in the sequence are 98 and 112.
The missing number in this sequence is 64, or 4 raised to the third power. You find the answer by noting that each number in the sequence is a counting number starting at 1 that is raised to the third power. For example, 2 raised to the third power (2 x 2 x 2) is 8.
The answer depends on where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to go.Furthermore, whatever number you choose and wherever in the sequence it is meant to be, it is always possible to find a polynomial of degree 5 that will go through all five points given in the question and your chosen one.Using a polynomial of degree 4, the next number is -218.The answer depends on where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to go.Furthermore, whatever number you choose and wherever in the sequence it is meant to be, it is always possible to find a polynomial of degree 5 that will go through all five points given in the question and your chosen one.Using a polynomial of degree 4, the next number is -218.The answer depends on where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to go.Furthermore, whatever number you choose and wherever in the sequence it is meant to be, it is always possible to find a polynomial of degree 5 that will go through all five points given in the question and your chosen one.Using a polynomial of degree 4, the next number is -218.The answer depends on where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to go.Furthermore, whatever number you choose and wherever in the sequence it is meant to be, it is always possible to find a polynomial of degree 5 that will go through all five points given in the question and your chosen one.Using a polynomial of degree 4, the next number is -218.
This question cannot be answered for two main reasons. The first is that you have not specified where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to be. Clearly that makes a difference.Suppose you assume the missing number is the last in the sequence, then any number that you choose can be the next number. It is easy to find a rule based on a polynomial of order 6 such that the first six numbers are as listed in the question followed by the chosen next number. There are also non-polynomial solutions. Short of reading the mind of the person who posed the question, there is no way of determining which of the infinitely many solutions is the "correct" one. The same applies, wherever in the sequence the missing number was meant to be.
9 (between 8 and 16).
It all depends on the sequence you are talking about. For example, the next number in the sequence 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,_ would be 21. This would be the Fibonacci sequence as the rule is add the 2 previous terms to get the next term. Another example would be this: 11,121,1331,14641,______.The missing number is 161051, following the pattern of powers of 11, 11^1, 11^2, 11^3 and so on. If you understand what I am trying to say, it all depends on the sequence you are trying to find the number in.
36
need to find the missing number 8(7+23)=8(7)+8( )
It appears that a number of -79 is missing in the sequence and so if you meant -58 -65 -72 -79 -86 then the nth term is -7n-51 which makes 6th term in the sequence -93
Yes.
The answer depends on what number is missing and what numbers are known!
3591733 is a 7-digit number. A single number cannot define a sequence.